Imagine v2 rockets radiocall xd would be awsome no? but even if they introduce it into the game the fortnite players will have it nerfed cuz it will interfere with their run and gun fortnite call of duty style of play
6 Likes
My meteor is like this
3 Likes
Only if it’s V1 instead of V2 and can be intercepted by pilots i guess?
3 Likes
This is very stupid, as far as I know no V2 rocket was ever used on the battlefield, it was an expensive ballistic rocket designed to destroy targets in distant cities like London, its use on the front line is ridiculous due to its cost and poor accuracy.
6 Likes
How about US premium squad call the bomber to nuke the whole map.
Strategic weapons shouldn’t appear in this game.
4 Likes
nah its cringe either way, however a superheavy arty strike could still work, something in line with a B-4 howitzer.
I mean Im going to list off weapons because I think they are cool, but in game it could just be the same effect for them all, 1-3 rounds of SH howitzer rounds, across a wide area, or tight, but you would hear very distinctly the sound of the gun firing over the horizon.
21cm Morser 18 for the Germans
B4 203mm Howitzer for the Soviets
M115 203mm Howitzer for the US
M1 240mm Howitzer for the US (For extra shits and gigs)
Type 45 24cm Howitzer for the Japanese
3 Likes
Why not go further?
800mm
And copypaste it to all factions to ensure perfect balance.
1 Like
oh ofc, funny enough of all the factions, its actually the soviets lacking options for railway artillery tier, hence I tried to pick out the nice SH mortar tier which would still have been common enough in WW2, Japs were the hardest there, since they kinda kept their siege mortars for obliterating chinese civilians, but the Type 45 at least saw significant action in the Philippines and in the 1945 soviet invasion.
1 Like
yea i forgot to mention that it can be intercepted v1 too its a good idea
It was used on the Remagen Bridge
Make artillery even more cancerous than it is with dick sized capture zones. With V1 at least you can intercept it if you paid enough attention.
I mean thats why I listed variables,
Either you have multiple (2-3) SH shots over a wide area, similar effect of a 50-100kg bomb, so its more suppressive rather than destructive,
Or you can have a singular SH shot with a very narrow area, so its more destructive rather than suppressive, because once the one round lands, everyone is clear to move again, unlike artillery which can take a bit longer to clear.
Not to mention its cinematic af, unlike a V1 strike which is just goofy BFV type shit. Not to mention it would fit well in the rest of the game instead of only BR5.
I suppose your opinion have merits, however if we’re going to add heavy artillery strikes I’d like to see the capture point size enlarged.
Honestly the capture points deserve their own revamps, but thats a whole other debate there.
I mean for example, instead of planting a bomb on a random radio, we could have players spiking a gun, or targeting a depot of some type. Would allow for at least some visual diversity if nothing else. Personally Id like to see objective like blowing bridges and vice versa, but thats asking for a bit much I think.
1 Like
You were talking about V2’s as a call in strike, thats fortnite tier shit, next thing you know youll be asking for a homelander or miku skin.
Yes, and none of them hit the bridge 
.
Ultimately, it was a failed attempt to destroy the bridge, not support.
1 Like
No
Post stat before talking smack
Ima be real who’s good or not doesn’t matter the idea is bad
Yeah let’s add more stronger explosion that atomise infantry til no one will play infantry! Such a great idea