M3 half track with 75 mm cannon in the front for the US faction
29 Likes
That’s a tank destroyer, not a transport vehicle 
We already have the incorrect 251/9, lets not make more mistakes
4 Likes
The main problem with this APC is that it is too good for BR3 and too bad for BR4.(However, it would be an interesting addition to USA BR4)
1 Like
I mean the stummel is not a tank destroyer unlike this, but yeah this is a tank destroyer in the end of the day.
would be on par with the stummel ( somewhat ).
shells pen are not ideal, so it can be br III.
4 Likes
You’re right, because its a self propelled artillery. Vehicles like this that were modified with more powerful arms were no longer infantry transports
I still ask for them to change it to the “tank” slot
1 Like
nope
I’d rather see an italian apc. Or Japanese/Soviet event apc, those factions have never had an event one.
2 Likes
If we have stummel then why not. Universal carrier also cant carry 16 people.
