Sometimes? More like never. They´re the ones furthest away from the damn objective.
Well, when I play sniper while defending in Stalingrad, I often (pretty much always if the enemy tank is not bombing all the windows) snipe all over the city square and along the streets on the approach to the zone, and I often get 30-60 kills just from guarding one zone. This helps to keep it uncaptured even if the rest of the team is not helping and does not even try to run into the zone with some assaulters.
well… yeah? because it’s their job to survive longer than 30 seconds and make good use of that 0.01 dispersion sniper Kar98k, right? The rest of the team often dont even bother shooting at the enemies that are approaching the zone and lets them in, then loses. Unless the sniper fire eliminates the enemies standing in the zone and capturing.
Who the hell snipe with FG42 Sniper to begin with, at current state can’t even hit shite from 50m without missing a mile lmao
1 Like
Well… can your sniper kill everyone on the objective when it´s in a building? Thinning out the enemy is pointless when the few that make it still capture the objective. The sniper class has been a mistake and it´s removal would greatly increase gameplay enjoyability.
What a pathological approach. Yeah, let’s just remove it because you say so. Thinning out the enemy is essential, for goodness sake, you capture with numbers of the soldiers that survive. If whole squads reach the doors, and throw grenades inside, there is little chance that the defending team manages to push out the invaders before the capture bar is filled.
I litteraly said why if you continued to read that sentence.
No you can kill them the moment they enter because they can´t cap it if you have more people than they do.
Sounds like skill issue to me wich is on brand for sniper users.