Sure, this wasn’t a terrible match but just have a look at all the deaths my team had. This is because people kept spamming Shermans and 105s. And grey zone camping. BR II teams have no idea how to deal with BR III tanks, and that applies to all nations.
I want them to hardlock BR II to itself, since BR III has too many experienced players and BR II has too many players that have no idea what to do.
I understand you. But this happens in almost all BRs (except 5 of course, because we don’t have 6). I’ve been setting all my factions to BR2 for the past few days (although I don’t play Japan much). And it’s not really that bad, BR2 has been strengthened quite a bit in all factions and can compete with BR3.
Recent games in which I was uptiered.
I believe that no BR should be separated, or they should all be separated.
Maybe the problem is with the tanks?
I am saying it all the time. 
±0 MM should be goal, not ±1 MM of any kind.
All nations need a BR2 tank destroyer from BR3, the Stug 3F, and the Ho Ni 3 come to mind, since the Allies and Soviets have no issues against BR3 german or japanese tanks.
The Soviets have a low pen tanks and the Americans are stuck with the Crusader. (Well, it’s not a bad tank, but it has weak shells).
I think it’s better to leave the BR2 for tank destroyers that have really bad armor. Armored tank destroyers just encourage people to camp in the gray zone. They really don’t fit our style of play.
Of course, don’t think that these words are out of factional bias or anything else, anyway, I play in all factions and there are similar options for stug for all factions to add.(Su 85(That version with 45mm armor) and Gun Carrier (3-in))
Yeah againt enemies with literally no armoured tanks, like if the germans had a single armoured tank at BR3 and below, youd have a point. The T-28E is ridiculously OP atm, and we all know it, at least the T-28 is ATR vulnerable. The T-28E is both ATR invulnerable, but also absurdly survivable. Frankly I think the Stugs going down is the least the germans could get to get closer to be on par with it.
A very high penning tank already, not to mention the 75 in the Lee is equally as deadly. Both have a fast enough reload as to allow you to knock out the enemy turret and then quickly follow up with the rest of the crew.
As opposed to the unarmoured ones that charge in?
The pen of most Soviet tanks is around 80mm, which generally causes problems against the PZIV H (and similar models) because they have a hard time penetrating the hull and you have to fire multiple rounds into the turret to destroy the tank.
This tank is easily destroyed by all German BR2 tanks. They have no difficulty destroying it.
The Crusader has a very bad shell. It has no TNT and sometimes you have to fire several of shots to destroy a tank (especially with German tanks, whose ammo racks are usually located underneath).
And the M3 Lee is very unreliable. Most of the time the cannon doesn’t do anything.
But anyway, as I said, there are similar options for the US and the Soviets. If anything changes, they can be added.
I love my BR2 Allies, but I rarely play with them because I almost always lose with them. I have better luck playing level three or level five with my Allies, but level two? Forget about it. 
However, I wish the Dev’s would get to the point where they would give us a true 0/0 match. Does it mean more bots? Yeah, but it seems like I get a fair number of bots in my games anyway.
I want ALL brs locked to themselves.
+/-0 is the way to go.
If br2 is separated from br 3 then I’d like to see all semi auto rifles given bolt action like damage.
What lmao? Its a nuclear shell, it has an insane filler that will nuke the crew, I have literally never not one shot a tank with the T-28E if the round penetrates.
Well thats just a flat lie, the MG turrets commonly soak up damage, I know myself, I have survived insane damage in the T-28E before.
Sometimes? 90% of the time more like. Still a plenty good tank, tanks dont need the the nuclear crutch shells the soviets get.
Ngl, sounds a bit like a skill issue, vs the Japanese its a terror, against the germans it can still carry its own weight, I do think it should get a APHE round for its gun, but as it is, it commonly decimates most things it hits. Once you get the hang of swapping to the 37 quickly, you will be flying with it.
Maybe not quite, but 18.0 or so would be a good spot.
But I like where you’re going
with this idea. 
18 is close enough that sounds good to me
I wonder if you have trouble destroying T28Es, how do you deal with T34s when you uptiered?
The same way I deal with Shermans in a 4F1, weakspot hunting, something the T-28E doesnt deal with, since you can pen it anywhere, but kill it no where. I mean this is a known fact? Or do you struggle in the T-28E?
Well, I was talking about Soviet tanks in general at the time, sometimes from some angles you can’t kill a tank with one or two hits and you have to shoot multiple times. And about the T28E, it happens sometimes for that too. The only time you can get a guaranteed shot is when you shoot the PZIV H hull. But low pen stops you some times.
And of course, the story is different with the 75mm short(F1). It should be weak against tanks, as it has a very rapid fire rate.
100’%.
I mean, they have 4 MM tiers now… good grief, what would be the harm in 5 tiers?
The only soviet gun that doesnt 1 shot is the 45mm, and even that can one shot a surprising amount of the time.
Also no lmao, a turret shot almost always one shots any Pz 3 or Pz 4, the 76mm at least.
