It probably would have made more sense, but mkb42h in Berlin would look weird 
I mean so will the Fedorov and the AVS 36. Both were longggg gone by 1945
2 Likes
Not much weirder than in Moscow and Normandy I guess.
1 Like
STG, FG42 II and PPSH drum are the meta kings, for a good reason.
To be honest I’d leave everything as is… I don’t have problems vs avs, fg, m2 and the like. People using those are generally high lvl (those are all high lvl weaponry) so of course they have more experience and are deadlier than those not yet having them (who have less experience)
But people in this type of game like to complain. So if it makes those shut up then I won’t mind. Till those same people start whinning on the next thing they deem “op” after 5 minutes.
1 Like
Well. I just want my old Moscow back without T-50s, Panzer IV campers and StG-PPSH spamers.
5 Likes
Me too but those days are long gone…I remember before Moscow had any semi auto rifles and it was far better
1 Like
Oh that would be great…
Maybe they could separate Moscow and Stalingrad so we’d have our Bolt actions and old weapons paradise again…
But I dream.
2 Likes
Holy spirit of rant.
Am I the freakin’ only one remained, who can live with the fact that other players can actually be better with me, regardless of the gun in their hands?
Will your butt hurt any less, when the same guys who mowed you down with FG/PPSH will still mow you down just the same with semiauto or BA instead?
3 Likes
You warm my heart a bit:
Here I thought I was the only one thinking those fg threads are only people complaining for the sake of complaining.
You bet if they nerf anything, those same people will eventually whine that bolt actions are unfair because they down others in a single shot…
1 Like
The fg42 isn’t OP on its own - its just dumb that you can give it to everyone in a squad
4 Likes
I come from War Thunder.
I’ve seen first hand what REAL imbalance/unfairness by design is like.
I’ve driven tanks with paper armor and crappy gun vs heavy monsters. And vice versa.
I’ve been fighting in pitch black night when half the players had IR or thermals, and the others had none.
I’ve been killed by guided missiles fired by a helicopter 10 km away, untouchable by AAA.
I’ve seen subsonic fighter-bombers being regularly matched against supersonic fighters with radar and long range missiles.
I’ve seen said supersonic fighters being delivered stock with guns only and no flares, and having to unlock their equipment by fighting naked against fully equipped opponents.
In Enlisted, starter (STARTER) rifles OHK anyone as long as your aim is decent, and yet dudes complain…
5 Likes
You had a long way of suffering, Chapeau!
I came from RO1 and 2, and sure everything was restricted but… riflemen killed with one shot, or incapacitated people easily.
Also played H&G (nerfs over nerfs over nerfs killed the game)
Played WT too…
And I 100% agree with you said.
3 Likes
Yes, instead of that we should have the PPSh-41 available to every class of soldier, over 5 000 000 were built during the war so it would be realistic 
2 Likes
Lol oh boy more brrrrr. We already include weapons that were gone long before 1945 so giving the Germans an earlier StG variant doesnt seem to be an issue. Historical accuracy has long died here
9 man PPSh squad 
1 Like
When can we get an FG with rifle grenade?
Also I agree with you, just leave everything alone weapons wise, fix bugs, add maps, and work on Pacific.
1 Like
Ikr?
There are are more pressing issues! Restricting something a MINORITY of players use… won’t solve bugs, nor will make gameplay better, because those players will merely use the new meta.
I still use bolties in every campaign, and lo and behold, fg guy still fall with just one BA shot… especially since those auto rifles require more time to aim correctly or at the very least, many shots
But auto rifles WILL get nerfed anyway, too many complaints. It just won’t solve anything, as people will merely complaint about something else afterwards.