The Germans, who are seriously inferior in infantry firepower, can be given 150 or 100 bullets mg34,
the Soviet Union can be given Maxim Tokarev light machine guns
the reason for proposing a belt type instead of the existing 75-gun drum cartridge mg34.The Moscow front has a very serious difference in infantry weapons between the Axis and Allied powers.
After the machine gun nuff, the Germans felt that machine gun fire was seriously inferior, and the addition of dt29 to the Soviet Union lost the advantage of machine guns, and even the recent update of mkb42 did not make up for the German close combat vulnerability
The Soviet Union has been given an automatic surface-rope rifle that is very powerful not only in close combat but also in medium-range combat, and even has a speaker power of 100 higher than mkb42, so the firepower gap is now too serious
You need a mkb42 buff or a nuff from Fedorov, but most importantly, if you give the Soviet army a better machine gun and the German army a drum cartridge mg34, the serious balance will be further damaged due to the disadvantage of the drum cartridge.
Well it sounds lovely but im afraid it’s time for Patronentrommel 34.
But well than i think they would give something much more fits to the soviets instead of the MG, just as the case of Berreta M38 (20-round magazine) and DT-29.
The worst level, such as level 30, should not be repeated.
Ah yes, another weapon that is copy pasted but with one number in stats changed.
MG34, MG34 with PT, MG34 with 100 rounds, MG34 with 200 rounds. All differ in one statistic.
“1000s of weapons”
Or maybe it could be the MG 15, which could be found at the Editor.
MG34 with 100-rnd Link to MG34 with infinite-rnd Link. The possibilities are infinite, so there vould be infinite kinds of weapons, only even counting a single weapon lol
Soviets MT
Germany MG15.
Nobody want another mg34.
Always say it and will.
The mg15 is no different from the mg34 drum cartridge version It’s uglier and worse
Instead of adding new Mgs with same issues how about buffing MGs in first place?
I dont know how another PTSD34 with 100 more bullets will make the difference.
I wouldnt care so much if the MG34 wouldnt be so damn inaccurate.
100 more bullets just means more bullets which magically get dispersed.
Same goes for the Maxim.
I think MKB will probably be buffed. ENLISTED’s mKb has a lower rof value than the actual model. Tunisian Drum Thompson also had a rof of 1000, but because of historical evidence, it has recently been revised. according to actual history, and for balance reasons, MKB should be buffed. FEDEROV is an incredibly powerful and His competitor was the MP43, it was great too. However, MKB is a lower version of Mp43 Therefore, it is not appropriate to place them in the same position. In fact, the developer’s sense is literally terrible. Instead of giving the Normandy axis the stg44, they gave the allies the M1928a1, which is no different than the m1 Thompson. Sometimes i feel like they ruining the game themselves.
Mkb is ok used as auto-carabine for infantry, or self-defence weapon for enginer but as assaulter gun is very dissapointing, in moscow kiraly remain the best weapon for german assaulter
How about f2 for tank 4 or m for tank 3, m with 20mm additional armor to protect against t34 armor piercing rounds, since mkb42 is already in the game, I guess these tanks are nothing
The mg15 has a cool anti-aircraft sight.
So it’s definitely better.
Any machine gun is now more or less effective only at the maximum level.
MG 34 on 6 \ 4 stars (different campaigns, different number of stars) can kill two squads in a second (at a short distance, less than 100 meters).
Although dispersion is evil.