someone pick up that phone because i fucking called it!
merge was a failed plane from the start said it would not work but no one lessened game got worse with merge. Taking away choices, br ratings, removing items/squads from store, the currency and tec tree … It was ALL clearly bad ideas and proof that gijin is the devs running the show no not dark flow as it is all copy pasted from the worse game war thunder to make a money mill out of the game. IT WAS DESTINED TO FAIL.
no it was never a balanced game
so… you’re claiming that people bought the squad just because they can fight in all fronts instead of the squad it self and somewhat value of being unique in the sense of being moroc units?
way to go vee… way to go…
the discussion was more that the merge is bad.
with all sort of non problems thrown in between.
that… is less " fine ".
as much one can have opinions, that’s completely fine.
even if it’s " dumb " or " nonsense " ( which i would like to make clear, this is not the case. nothing so far that has been said is dumb. unless out of context. which isn’t the case ) everyone has a right to express it.
but to sit and complain calling the merge a failure it’s quite ridiculous. and illfounded.
you may not like it. and that’s fine.
but was needed.
Friends, I also said I don’t need to be 100% historical right?
I can ignore historicity as long as its existence is balanced
But if the existence of something is neither historical nor balanced, it would be a bit funny.
Ok so, some 1944 japanese have no problem to appear in 1942 maps, but sherman and cruiser tanks which were well operational at that time are a no go ? Seems fair and unbiased…
then what you are looking for is not an historical game.
enlisted can offer such experience through mod ( and could even more through customs. but no one gaved a flying fuck about those. so that’s what we got instead )
is the merge balanced?
arguably, yes and no.
far from perfect. and i was along many others the first to point that out.
but can be adjusted.
the HA, i’m afraid it’s a lost cause as far as it goes for the base matchmaker.
At least it shouldn’t be a one-sided game
The US military has too many superior weapons in the Pacific, and the German army has too many superior weapons in BR5
Isn’t this a problem with the game?
The devs said that “people” complained on the test server that their premium squads “lost their unique cosmetics” in other fronts.
Sounds like the aesthetically correct and logical solution which would be replacing weird looking cosmetics in other fronts was scrapped exactly to cater to premium squad sales.
Yes.
My resume:
It became a little better in gameplay.
And a lot worse in immersion.
as i said, it was more of a paradox that will be addressed once more equipment will be introduced.
and the various equipment issues addressed ( such as jumbo ).
god didn’t made the world in 1 day as they say.
so, it is to be expected that the situation will not improve until next major update that it’s in 10< days
p.s you can’t really fix the players on how they behave or play.
some are good than others,etc
It is important that they be balanced and not lead to one-sidedness
But do you think the weapons in the current Pacific campaign are balanced?
ah, i see.
well, yeah, i find that one dumb too.
but at the same time… can’t really blain anyone as you buy those squads for their appearance.
on the other hand, they did promised different uniforms for these units, and those did not came.
even though devs stated they will sort that issue out… somehow.
kinda was to be expected though…
Infantry USSR > Germut > US
Tank Germut > USSR > US
Planes US > Germut / USSR ( Not massive differency between germut / USSR )
I dont really see murricans suffering in BR5, regardless of inferior infantry equipment & tanks obviously.
USSR has no equipment excuse.
Pacific BR’s needs some overhaul, thats all.
Balanced = all the same captured copy&paste weapons for everyone.
I hate seeing the Jumbos in the Pacific, but in this thread there are more tears than I can bear.
I do not think so
When a problem arises, the problem itself should be solved rather than introducing new things to solve the problem.
This will make the entire camp bloated.
Let’s take a look at the Soviet army. In order to limit the FG42-2, it strengthened the AVT. In order to limit the MP43, it strengthened the Fedorov. In order to limit the STG44, it gave the AS44 with homogeneous performance.
I don’t think this will completely solve the problem. If it can be solved, the Soviet army in BR5 will not be so small.
So let’s address the problem itself
i suppose a matter of opinions.
as far as it goes,
there’s work to be done.
and expecting results in less than a day ( unless it was like customs exploits about xps on bots ) you can’t really expect them to solve them in a day.
or a week.
i’m afraid it takes more time unless it directly affect df financially.
but, for the time being, there’s planty of content to explore and stuff to grind.
or… the mods editor is always open for anyone.
It’s been a while since the merge, but I haven’t seen any mention of balance issues. Even if it’s not implemented, just a little mention would make me feel reassured.
I may be a little impatient, but I’m more worried that DF has no intention of solving it at all.
According to helpers, devs are waiting for statistics.
So they’ll most likely nerf Japanese, since they’re winning hard rn lmao
far from being perfect.
but it’s a start.
When the Stalingrad Battle DLC and Pacific Battle DLC are released in 2022, DF will be updated and balanced very quickly and will respond within 2 to 3 days.
Haha, then I will go back to BR5 German Army and enjoy my life