Some points might be to fast to cap in my opinion but when it comes to the beaches its rightfully so in a way.
Campaign wise i think the reason Allies might loose more (which hasnt been the case for me) is that they attack more then defend. Usually in war games and irl defending is easier overall.
Could also perhaps be the player base active there rn since i see more Jumbos then the actually Panther which ive seen now and then. But on the other hand ive seen way more low level planes from the US side then others so its all here and there.
Have more to get from here for sure to get an bigger picture but rn it seems pretty even Steven, even if we recently lost 6 matchen in a row and not just by a little ^^
And to add: This is actual stat of 100 matches and no quits…Ive put myself banging my head to that wall this time xD But i was close believe me lol
Sometimes the matches are just stacked against though ^^ Had an excellent fighter pilot by my side <3 Was an hard time to predict where the enemies where at since the damn team did barely mark anything as usual ^^
PS. If you play as Germany dont go NA servers rn…we lost 12 games in a row rly bad ^^
dont know mate, for me it feels like attackers win more often in general ( well besides the bomb gamemode, cuz you loose progress very fast once your bomb gets defused )
Normandy was at the beginning of open beta very US favoured, but that has changed now. I guess allies suffer now because getting off that beach is actually pretty difficult to do- first capture points are kinda hardcore, lots of grayzone tank sniping, no safe place to plant your radios cuz no cover…
“Also germans have now Panther and panzerfaust to counter Jumbos, as well as STG and FG”
You need to play both side not Axis only and Think balance.
Im level 32 on Alied and level 25 on Axis. WIN RATE Alied 60% and Axis 67%.
90% playtime Im SOLO Play.
Ofc and ive stated this asw. But you can see how things perform and make an assessment of the situation which im trying to be as partial as possible ofc. But like im always stating that there is more to see and trying not to dive the head way to much in to it before ive seen it and having back in my mind also that there are other factors in mind like player base stacked against each other and so on.
Before i came to Normandy ive heard that it was an shitshow for US and Germany owned that map. Might be so in the past but its not my experience rn. Rn it feels more balanced then Moscow but on the other hand ive played Moscow full campaign so thats why im saying its way to early to tell…Also because i havent reached the later weaponry yet but ive tried some of them out
And yes ive also played Russia couple of times after ive finished the Moscow campaign and could clearly see what my assessments told me from being on the other end. I also picked up every gun and tried them for some time to get a taste of what their capabilities are but sure more time is needed incl vehicles in different situations
But if you seen the battlefield long enough as you have experienced it you can see whats dominating or not and what makes sense or not when you have been playing similar fps war games for a very long time. Its nothing new so to speak
Ill get to that part after ive finished the 4 Campaigns as Germans. I do this on every similar fps war games and pick one side and fully commit to them til im finished then i switch. Last game i happened to be Russia participated in a big clan to add, so Germany was the time in this one ^^
But read what ive also typed instead of narrating