i can be considered some sort of competitive player as i do enjoy competition, but in other games, not this one that was proclaimed to be realistic and casual. and i guess i’m really saturated from competitive pvp ( i guess burned out cuz of valorant, R6, cs and overwatch ). and for be a beta, it’s definitely not the right time to think about comps thingies in my honest opinion.
either way, can’t play it because of Tunisia it self. i haven’t touched that campaign yet outside the open matches with no progression. so it’s kinda a " fault " on my end that i didn’t took advantage of the xps for the first weeks to reach a certain ammoun of xps. but currently, i’m not really interestred in tunisia. ( not because i have to grind for the 4th time one campaign ) but because i still have to finish the other campaigns.
from a technical point, it’s just a ““playlist”” of tunisia destruction with players that will do anything to win for.
so, crouch spam, prone spam, bhop, faster medkits, automatic weapons meta and campers everywhere.
which again, as i used to play competitive games, i wouldn’t mind it, but i wouldn’t make a competitive game in the first place, when half of the mechanics are barely working ( such as airplanes & Tank models and every other issues already well known across this forum ).
which brings me to the next point.
usually, competitive games are balanced in terms of gameplay and equipment in order to let the players face equal if not similar opponents.
in enlisted, this will be and it’s currently impossible to achieve. someone at DW or gaijin explains me how can you compare a german based on their equipment and skills to an american player ( or the other way around for that matter )? when there are clearly substancial differences.
like the weapons and vehicles, most of them, are simply not equal nor even comparable to the opponent weapons. and on top of that, just the enivorement.
tell me how much fun can it be to face full sweats with super ultra equipment ending up using the cheapest tactic. is that how competitive should be? prone spamming left and right? bunny hopping the shit out of everyone? it’s so flawed and not so thought out well this whole concept to be brought in enlisted that i think I’m speechless.
it’s like making a cake without half ingredients. yes you can, but it’s going to be shite.
and this is how i see the whole thing about it ( yes, it’s not ““out”” yet as a whole, but knowing how things goes arounds, it’s just my “”""“prediction”"""" . )
P.S. i’m not trying to say " DW / Gaijin BAD ueu ewewe11!!!1 " and shit like that.
although, it is too earlier to even think about competitive matches when the state of the game is still a bit… i’d just say " rough ". i’d rather had to play some sort of pvp/pve match with new experimental mechanic, or new experiments on ai to see what players really like and/or see if the players wants them in the first place… ( like, coop climbing with AIs to reach higher positions similar to war face that requires one unit or more players… perhaps Tank/Airplanes AI or even just new gamemodes that are different from involving a point a and b )
so yeah, that’s it.
just my opinion, and i wish to be wrong. but we’ll see.
