I would love this game to take the best mapping and tactical opportunity from hell let loose and apply it here
2 Likes
kind of proving my other idea might help the game a lot, matches that boil down entirely to just spawn camping and don’t have push or pull or balance at all should just end early to keep player retention high, nobody likes getting pounded for the entire game and not making any progress, which results in more players leaving and then you get total bot farms which sucks for both sides…
Subjective, I dare say. Most of the times, I’d have more fun chilling against bots than suffering against human veterans tearing my rear cheeks apart.
Of course, being alone with bots VS a full veterans team would not help.
3 Likes
yeah I agree that is one of the things Hell Let Loose does much better, only problem they haven’t solved is long distance spawn camping…
I would say having a real matchmaking system would solve that issue for the most part, but Hell Let Loose has a spawn protection/HQ spawn system and flanking mechanic that works a lot better this game could definitely learn from…
We can only try to help make this better by telling what we see, and hope devs listen. usually a one way mission.
1 Like
i’ve always been in favour of reducing the grey zone. like you said (and despite what others tend to say) explosive packs arent that powerful anymore and for a lot of tanks you need to take a few seconds to aim them, which makes it pretty likely for you to die. ‘but just use a plane’ isn’t always an option, because there might be some fool flying around who doesn’t know how to use it to kill the tank.
1 Like
I think it is only a drag to go against veteran teams/players when your team isn’t balanced or similar level and they leave and you end up having bots for teammates…but if both sides are evenly matched I would argue the game is a lot more fun, plus if you don’t want a challenge you can already play the training mode and just fight bots no? If you just want the scenery/vibe of the game without the challenge? Are AI only games still an option I haven’t checked…
grey zone killed me plenty, even scrambling
1 Like
yeah good point that is exactly the issue, perhaps allowing certain units to go behind the enemy line would make a potential quick fix, for instance maybe only snipers and anti tank units? Snipers because they are a recon unit and AT to prevent grey zone camping? Would make the AT squads much more fun to play also if they could actually be put to use…
1 Like
yeah sadly as long as people keep spending money on this game WITHOUT these issues being fixed, they won’t see it as necessary to fix IMO, I think we should just cancel all premium and encourage others to do the same until a real give and take communication takes place to make all of our effort worthwhile…I would gladly spend money on this game if pay to win was removed and they were honest and transparent and put out voting/polls for certain changes to gather information and get new ideas to improve the game…that IMO is what the making enlisted a better place posts on the launcher SHOULD be…a polling system to gather information from the players about the existing mechanics in the game…
as a tanker from BFEWAW old school I feel this game has promise. I am probably delusional 
but I want these devs to win
2 Likes
I have seen a lot of shady stuff and abuse from these devs so I don’t really want them to win lmao, but I do want this GAME to do well, something needs to take COD and BF games off their pedestal, I do realize 2042 opened the door for this game to do well I just feel the way they are handling it is a huge wasted opportunity…
Yes
I could simply answer that custom battles grant no progress, but instead I’ll say the forbidden words:
I’m looking for FUN in a game. Sometimes I’ll look for it in a challenge, sometimes I’ll enjoy the lack thereof.
1 Like
When they stray from history, the game becomes plastic and dull with no real foundation and loses the base. The fact that they did so little homework as to name operations as campaigns speaks volumes to the true integrity of it all. I welcome whatever huge revamp they have in little mind to this point.
1 Like
nothing wrong with that was just curious, I prefer a fair and balanced challenge which is what I hope they fix with this game, as it is now I can’t get anyone from my server to come back to the game, we had 50+ active players and over 200 monthly players on the server, tis a shame
couldn’t agree more, also they don’t seem to be making an effort to collect data from the ENTIRE playerbase, most of these poor changes seem to be made only to appease a select few trolls and people complaining without considering the playerbase as a whole…game has definitely lost its foundation in realism and arcade shooter coming together for a fun experience…also the lack of major bug fixes and design flaws has left many unwilling to come back and invest their time and money into the game…hopefully the devs do a 180 or they fire them and get better devs more capable of coding properly and communicating politely with the community instead of just pandering to trolls…
With finesse they could win it all. I hope they get off the other path.
1 Like
note to devs- stick hard to history, your players will like it
3 Likes
started a topic about removing pay to win and keeping pay to progress you are welcome to provide ideas and input to help the devs on that topic, as for this topic, what is the consensus in general? Grey zone seems to be an issue with all of us so what have we heard from this topic that seems to be best solution? Did anyone like my solutions? Do you guys have other solutions?