Hard limits on partisans

It may sound rude, but I think the problem here is more about your team being bad. It gives me the impression, that you would have been spawn killed either way, if not partisans, then by planes, tanks, etc…

One thing I would definitely see nerfed, is the amount of ammo they can carry. Right now their other ability, to pick up other weapons with full ammo, seems kinda redundant.

1 Like

I mentioned them, because they are the reason guerrillas were made
Doofus :smiley:

Strange that most people don’t use them for hunting tanks. Let alone greyzone tanks.

For example, to this day I have never once been destroyed by guerrillas when I was in tank. :man_shrugging:

So that reasoning was completely wrong. And I’ve been saying this before they were added to the game in the first place. Guerrillas are not a proper solution for greyzone tanks.

I bet if I look at your replay. Then most of the time you’ll be using guerrillas for completely different things than focusing at destroying greyzone tanks.

And further more, the solution that I provided would not help camping tanks at all. Quite the opposite, everyone could reach them. Not just one gimmicky class.

You clearly didn’t read anything in this topic/discussion. You just wanted to mock tank players for whatever reason.

1 Like

I kill like 5+ tanks per game with my Guerrillas
I read the message of the OP
And yes, the class was literally designed to stop grey zone tanks
You’re solution is conceptually flawed, guerrillas are already breaking the game by running around in the spawn, lets just let every class do that! What a terrible idea
Tank players deserve all the mocking they get :smiley:

1 Like


Exclusively using guerrillas to hunt spawns and destroy any vehicle leaving their spawn
Only a few of their tanks made it out of the spawn area in this game
But you are right, nobody is using these to hunt vehicles, thats why they get 5 tnt charges, to destroy barb wire on the objective :person_shrugging:

In the end, I will find out that you have built an AA somewhere and shot down 2 bombing runs :PP.

Screenshot itself is hardly an evidence.

Interesting.

1 Like

https://enlisted.net/en/replays/#!/replay/382589824097422884

1 Like

Thats how i use them. I go tank hunting all the time

Honestly, it should have been a five man squad that could only carry pistols into battle and to keep the ability to pick up enemy weapons with full ammo. The trade off would be that their sprint speed would be somewhat on par with the ppsh 2 medic squad russian women’s sprint speed.

They would be really quick, but extremely fragile, that is until they find an enemy weapon of some sort.

Hell, could even tie a feature where if they found an enemy ammo box, they could hold the interact key and find a basic rifle from within, and then booby trap it at the same time so that it explodes when the enemy tries to resupply.

Having them as chokehold assaulters ruins the pace of many maps ngl.

3 Likes

Well, I haven’t met a single like that yet. :man_shrugging:

step 1: desert the game

alternatively

step 1: desert the game

Personally, I’d like to be able to read this post (and others that have also been flagged); just because a few people in the community are “offended” by what this person said doesn’t necessarily mean that it’s offensive. Everybody these days seems to be offended by the smallest of things—it’s become utterly ridiculous.

So… Why isn’t there a way that I can click on this post to read what it says?

4 Likes

Because the flag was approved as inappropriate.

It wasn’t that bad. It was basically just calling the people complaining about it crybabies

Really? It was flagged for that? OMG, it’s an opinion not an attack! Unbelievable!

Thanks for letting me know…

There was more to it than that. But what’s done is done. Let it go.

I never had a hold of it. :slight_smile: I just don’t like seeing someone’s opinion being censored.

1 Like

Moderator’s decisions happen for a reason. You may not agree with or understand it, but it’s usually warranted. It isn’t about censorship, it’s about keeping the forum clean of trolling and disrespect.

i said in an objective manner people who whine about partisans should need to build more rallies.

youre right, the flagging system in this forum is childish nonsense. i flag maybe 2 posts per year, others flag one every day. i told the staff here to inable the flagging effect of people who abuse the system, but some of the staff here are of the same mental material as the forum troglodytes, so this forum is stuck in the form where no normal person can take it serious.

if DF wasnt lazy, they would have kicked the person out who doesnt understand how to moderate a forum and implement a flag system that actually improves the quality of discussion instead of catering to the lowest of the low.

sometimes 50% of the posts here are passive aggressive bs spammed by the same toxic people and these comments dont get deleted. other comments are straight up idiotic and objectively wrong opinions about aspects of the game, cluttering up the forum bc they get spammed by the same low brows dozens of times per month. these also dont get deleted/flagged.
but a normal person here saying idiot to clearly idiotic posts/opinions gets flagged? thats socially incompetent moderation if ive ever seen one. ive seen many forums over the last 15 years and this is the possibly worst moderated one. the intellectual levels of discussions are low, the flagging is nonsensical and the just ca. 5 toxic people who ruin the quality of discussion get to stay toxic while every normal person addressing their nonsense gets flagged.
this is the reason why this enlisted forum has a horrible reputation. of course no competent person will want to become a mod in an environment like that —> the forum becomes an echo chamber of nonsense and inbred toxicity.

1 Like