Change my mind
i love my slow punchy piece of metal i dont care if its the M3 or the M3A1
however
this gun is like peeing outside in a windy day
Change my mind
i love my slow punchy piece of metal i dont care if its the M3 or the M3A1
however
this gun is like peeing outside in a windy day
2 hit kill gun with terrible rate of fire.
dont know mate, better pick a Sten at this pointā¦
but at least has a good range
Gonna do some simple math to prove you wrong
Thompson has a higher RoF
Higher RoF means more .45 ACP being shot per second
More .45 ACP being shot per second means more lead being thrown down range
More lead being thrown down range means more lead for the enemy to catch with their teethā¦and skullā¦and torsoā¦and armsā¦.and, and legs. Anywhere really it doesnāt matter itās .45 ACP
So Thompson better
i dont want more lead down the range
i want lead on my enemy.
i dont want chances
i want certainty
so GREASE WINS
The thomspon is better as close range
ye
but why it has to be this way ?
Woe, wall of .45 ACP upon ye
Personally I prefer how the Thompson both sounds and looks.
As for in game, I rather the sten but bring the grease gun to larp with a US squad.
I hear you Edward, the M3ās maybe a bit slow but are like lasers compared to the Thompson.
what is that skin ?
ohohoho
ye
i knew it
there is good news for you
donāt make me depressed that hng is goneā¦was it a good game no but it was fun at times
I thought this discussion is about US weapons, not Soviets ones.
Donāt you remind me
Japanese and Soviet ones
I think you mean ābehind and around youā since those wastes of metal just spray everywhere and the bullets are slower than post service
I do not like Thomson
But this is one of the few early high-speed submachine guns
If I could react
I usually switch to semi-automatic mode when shooting at mid-range to make up for the shortcomings of recoil.
After entering the advanced environment, I will directly use M2 and T20