he must have meant your red star undead necrotic skeleton shining like that last soviet flag that was downed in 1991
Once the flag is lowered, it will be raised again, don’t worry. 
With regards to the skeleton in the Soviet form, it is the personification of how much he does not try to kill the Soviet soldier, all the same, the Soviet soldier will destroy the next “ubermensh”, thirsting for “estates, lands and slaves in the East”
This is what we called based
man it wasnt lowered it was downed, and downed for a good reason… better just move on with life … what some of you eventually cannot do if red star has to be still everywhere 
another regime that didnt worked out as planned … give people poor economy and ban them interstate movement and it usually ends up like this, give them propaganda gibberish of how great everything is, lock down everyone who says otherwise, all of a sudden countries that provided you with stuff needed for the motion of union broke out and left… to never see again such a great leech that soviet union was, it degenerated many people to so big financial corruption that later after fall of soviet union errupted in such a cancerous way that its stil problem to this day …
people who could not achieve property back then, after fall of union could not feed their needs properly 
but some of them could do that during soviet era but that was secret 
not to mention privatization that followed and ruined or consumed whole factories either by incompetent people or too much competent oligarchs
anyway i think that if i was russian i wouldnt want old times back , i would want something new and way better
Which part is unbalanced, again?
as an italian youtuber/commentator said a month ago, russia could have become cool and do many things to make it one of the best countries in the world, instead prefered to remain anchored to the past of the empire, of the soviet union because it was easier than changing
god knows, you answered wrong person
it is not the first time that russia could have changed, peter the great did many things to russian empire that were well, but tsarist regime was not likes eventually and soviet one just anchored country away and closed its economy to the world
it surely aint easy to govern 150 milion people
Yes, but something new and way better means things getting worse for the western block.
Yeah. It could also join NATO and EU. Wait, it even tried in 2000s.
You don’t remember why US and main european countries are still rich. By the cost of all other world living worse and working for it.
You just don’t like to admit that some countries still have colonies, even while not calling them that.
this politic between leder, the change of a nation come by the people, i dont see russian in the past decade try to force their leader to a change otherwise they give all the power to putin and his boys
well i believe russian people can choose their own fate regardles if west will like it or not … just like china is doing it … but russia decided to play chess with their resources instead …and is doing war with some other country like it was not already big enough
And that’s what happens now.
If you have thing that everyone needs, why shouldn’t you be using it as a weapon? That’s how it always worked.
I already said about modern colonies.
Russia don’t want UA be a western proxy and wants it to be our proxy instead. That’s how it works. And yes, it also leds to Russia controlling more oil, more ports and more food production.
Well man, forcing somebody to be your proxy isnt cool in anyway no matter who is doing it imo… besides russia should be more appealing to other countries in different way so others would actually want to join it… rather than walking over border with young battalions because of some kind of denazifiation and making civilians suffer … yeah sure
in todays most parts of world people can choose their allies, in EU or NATO i dont feel im forced to be someones proxy
and imo UA wants to have the same freedom of choice
why does russia wants to use it as weapon in a first place ?
because such solutions are long gone with empires and reichs, no one is actually attacking russia or wanted to attack becuase what would it bring, in my opinion😃 really only thing that can be done is war and cutting off supplies ?
no it is not the only solution
just because country sits on strategic resources should not mean it can play with it like a kid…
yeah it seems only like back to the soviet union without freedom of speech , like if there was not anything better than this
what ? half of continent isnt enough for russia ? if the country cant manage such vastness it possess then few kilometres of new land would not help
Nope.
Most of countries can’t be fully independent. Countries such as ukraine or baltic ones can only be choosing between neutrality (and getting all profits from both sides) or going the retarded way and trying to pick a side. But instead of getting more profits from one side, this leads to getting a powerful enemy (trading with which is a huge part of your economy) and being more dependent from other side, so it can do with you whatever it wants.
Does your arm know that it’s being controlled by you?
If west can use their technologies, resources, ports, banks, routes, etc. as a weapon why shouldn’t russia do the same?
Again, it’s not about want you or not. It’s about can you or not.
8 years of trying to solve the problem diplomatic way. Instead, someone have gone full retarded with “le rusia le bad, moskovito de opresso”.
Or what?
Just because a country owns banks it doesn’t mean it can just steal money of other country, but it happened, and it happens not for the first time.
Now look what’s that “half of continent”. Endless cold forests or literal wastelands where noone lives. And again, who controls resources and important routes, controls the world. Deal with it.
Yes, evil moskals are building ussr 2.0 for 30 years already, still can’t build. You guys say that every time when russia does something that you don’t like.
Point at him and laugh, he thinks that empires are gone.
What is unbalancd? The Germans have their own PPSh and the Mkb and a more usefull AT weapon. The only disadvantage are tanks ad depending on taste planes.
IIrc the Axis used to rule Stalingrad during first month.
Its more balanced and interesting than Moscow or pre-Tiger Berlin.
There were only about 7,000 made. That’s fewer pattern 1 and 2 FG-42s than Pz. IVs.
Yeah but they were adopted and made. In the thousands.
Not rejected by the military like AS-44 or time traveled like MKB-42 to Moscow.
And used by the most elite troopers, not by some volkssturm boys.
Wow, how much you scribbled the text.
Only there is one caveat - I absolutely do not care about all this nonsense and lies. The sources of all this nonsense are a salad created from 2-3 separate real episodes, mixed with tons of lies from the Goebbels department and ending with all sorts of anti-Soviet clowns, whose place is in a madhouse, in the ward of violently mad people.
Seven thousand. For comparison there were 1.1m MP40s (and variants) manufactured.
yes sure blame old nazi that dont even exist anymore … no lies my friend , only reality