why are you US lovers cry over somthing like that. Its not like the germans have a fuck ton of weapons that are not from germany
difference is that those weapons were actually used by germany unlike sten mark 2, PIAT, ross rifle, Lees, lanchester, and bren. but oh no itās not that bad that US units are using british and canadian equipment that they were never serviced with. and the only reason why most people can accept that US having springfield as their starting rifle is for balancing
1 Like
wee didnt use the FNAB the Breda the MAS the Manlicher and we didnt use the mp35/I the FG 42 II (witch didnt exist 1944) and the normal FG 42 wasnt at the Normandy landings so yeah the us are the only ones who dont have the right weapons
1 Like
yes they were https://www.forgottenweapons.com/submachine-guns/italian-fna-b43/
this one i canāt find outside of wiki
MAS-36: The Backup Rifle is Called to Action ā Forgotten Weapons sadly this is also wrong
this one is 100% correct
it was used by the SS Bergmann MP35/I - Internet Movie Firearms Database - Guns in Movies, TV and Video Games.
fg42 II is the type F i assume and canāt find much information about it so far
normandy isnāt JUST about d-day, itās about almost everything in normandy from d-day onwards which would include the battle of carentan where FG42 was used in and happened 4 days after the allies landed. so only one thing you stated was confirmed to not be used by germany during normandy and 2 that is up in the air
and in what quantity was it used you cant add weapons because there were a handfull of them
you mean like the pre ww1 springfield? because that was barely used outside of snipers. hell the only time springfields were used for infantry during ww2 was for garrisons in the pacific during the year of 1942. though there is a simple way to fix it instead of just getting rid of the guns is to change the divisions to the nations that used the guns respectfully
how mutch FNAB MAS manlicher and MP35/I and FG 42 were used
if you want to justify it
manlicher wasnāt used by the germans, i was agreeing on that and only a few thousand fg42s were built same with FNAB-43, though the MAS had a million built and alot of them were used in garrison since remember most fancy german shit was sent to where it was needed more specifically in italy and the eastern front
the point is was it on the landings and the few days after it were there enough to say yes it were there but as far as i know fg 42 both of them th mp 35/I and MAS werent enough there to say you can have it and your talk with the bazooka bad idea because than wee have a Panzerfaust 60 and that would be bad news for your tanks
oh yeah i agree bazooka would be a terrible weapon to add right now since it will just cause more complaining since there are already people complaining about the effectiveness of PIAT and i would rather have the divisions be accurate for the weapons then getting rid of them entirely, so like make the first bomber squad a british division ect. and we could do the same with the germans as well
No Commonwealth are getting there own Campaign let them have the PIAT and get rid of these Commonwealth weapons period. If you want a UK tech tree have them add another tech tree to Normandy i dont have to grind through to get weapons that were competant.
Invasion of Normandy was about more than just the USA. British and Canadian forces took part in it and should be represented. Instead of replacing their guns, we should be adding uniforms and squads of British soldiers.
1 Like
It seems very clear half of the German tree is bogged down by italian Tunisia campaign crap aswell. Its time to put these two factions to were there supposed to be and not test bed bs for another campaign
Then give them there own tech tree and stop polluting the American one.
There is no āAmericanā tech tree. It is the āAlliesā tech tree, so there is no tech tree to āpolluteā.
Show me the commonwealth vehicles the commonwealth soldiers or the commonwealth voices.
Right now its only American soldiers squads and vehicles that are polluted with early war crap filler equipment not even meant for this campaign as closed beta had entirely US equipment that crap is meant for the Tunisia campaign not Normandy If you want Commonwealth and i think they should be there but you whould have a choice which one you want as they never fought in intermixed units and were in seperate engagements.
It should be
Allies normandy
US tree
UK tree
Not intermixed bs were we have to grind trough crap weapons to get to 29 to get the standard issue SMG.
Which should be added to properly represent the allied campaign that it is.
The standard issue SMG for the Americans later in the war was the Grease Gun, as it was much cheaper.
Tompson was more prevelent still.
Seperate the tech trees the end Commonwealth will be getting Tunisia no point in duplicating the weapons in normandy when they are taking weapon spots away from more competant weapons.
Except almost all weapons are getting duplicated in one place or another - just look at all of the German weapons and how they overlap between all of the campaigns.
Because Germany used the same weapons on all there fronts
US didnt use half the shit in there tree, Therefor put them under the commonwealth tree and leave the US alone and give them the weapons they actually used. Combining the two only screws the US, Seperate trees is the only way to keep everyone happy.