Now that both Soviets and US have a strong AT launcher at BR2 - Germany needs something as well - especially since Soviets get for what ever reason a BR3 Panzerfaust.
KV1 and T34 are too much for the GrB, BR2 needs to be able to defend itself from armor.
talking about the first one
Unlike Panzerfaust 60 which has 200mm pen,
the small Panzerfaust has a much smaller range, projectile flies half as fast and has 140mm of penetration.
these might be too strong for BR2 though.
Even Panzerfaust Klein has 140mm of armour penetration.
it should be around 80-100mm pen.
well Panzerfaust 60 has 200mm of pen and is just one BR higher…
They already have the best anti-tank equipment (in terms of armor penetration)
So no need for better
lol no?
I do agree that Germany needs a better BR2 AT weapon.
Level 2 anti-tank grenade rifle has 90 penetration
Can defeat Sherman and KV1 if used properly
They also have the highest usage rate among level 2 equipment.
That’s why there is no need to give new
in general I need like 5-10 shots with the GrB to take out a KV1 - Bazooka is much stronger.
GrB is still terrible.
PzB-39 has terrible post pen and is much harder to aim than conventional AT rocket launchers.
and takes for ever to reload.
Well, I don’t. Current BR2 AT weapons are more than enough.
I have no clue why BR2 stuff should be very effective at countering BR3 tanks that are armored better than average.
Making their armor completely obsolete even against ATs of lower BR.
Plus with upcoming TnT spawn camper class, AT soldiers will become completely obsolete anyway.
When I use paratroopers, I sometimes use anti-tank grenade rifles
It shouldn’t be that bad
Usually about 3 rounds can detonate the turret ammunition rack from the front
But I prefer to blow up the engine with TNT
I think this is more like the advantages and disadvantages of individual camps.
They already have the best anti-infantry tanks in level 2, high-performance anti-aircraft aircraft, and submachine guns that are better than the United States.
no need to give more
The only country that really needs anti-tank rocket barrels is Japan
The end of the world for ground vehicles
not at all, it will just add greyzone camping monkeys but it will still be the most convenient way to destroy tanks by other tanks or rocket launchers.
which is the case for every tank in the game - except Soviet BR3
br2 Bazooka takes out German BR3 armor easily because Panzer IV, Panzer III and Stug III all have 50 mm of frontal armor at their turret or 80mm at chassis, which is more than easy to deal with.
Why shouldn’t Germans have it also easy to deal with BR3 tanks?
In most maps, the spawn points of tanks and infantry are quite far apart.
Taking into account the intelligence and abilities of 70% of players
I have every reason to believe that there will basically be no infantry dedicated to dealing with guerrillas
Because the remaining 3 normal people have to bear the offensive or defensive work, there is simply not enough manpower to intercept.
Guerrillas are fully capable of ambushing tanks
I can imagine more snipers being played in the future, to secure the backline, but that is a different topic.
Then why can the No. 4 75 long tube easily penetrate IS2?
Then why can they have stove pipes and 100MM iron fists at the same time?
Why can they get 4 models of Tiger?
you expect too much brain from the average player, sweats will just destroy the rallies than attack the objective from behind. Any unlucky tank might be blown up but they wont bother waiting for them, that wouldnt be profitable enough when you can just suicide bomb it.