It’s historically accurate! I really dislike this argument in a GAME. It doesn’t work long term, compromises have to be made for balance. It’s a game
I feel being historically accurate is outweighing fun and balanced game play. Not enough focus on actually making the game fun to play on a broader level.
Suggest focusing on bug fixes, gameplay balance, and match making issues.
You’ve been in comma since 2022 or what?
The game is ww2 themed, not historical by any means.
Seems like you lost the ability to spell “lose” correctly
So let me get this straight.
You want Japan and Germany to lose every match because it’s historically accurate?
How would it help the game?
Literally, he only claims in an ironic way that historical accuracy should not exist. But how to make something that no longer exists become non-existent?
Yeah, I suffer from this condition too.
do it in a way everyone can contribute to a discussion, i put this topic in mess room because lack of any substance for a suggestion topic
He may just have sent HLLoose’s suggestion in the wrong place XD
well tbh english sucks with is made up pronunciation.
Fixed
My ability to catch spelling errors isn’t the topic.
No it’s sarcasm, reread it.
Because people use it as reason to get the things they want in game.
Actually have seen people make this comment though, as excuses for Japan losing… Because it’s historically accurate.
It doesn’t, that’s the whole point
Learn to slaughter your enemies
and anything that helps in the fight
This is a themed shooter game, so there is no historical accuracy anyway.
For all who didn`t have served. There is no respawn when you are dead or fighting while wounded.
So to get upset about historical accuracy is absulut nonsense
Outside of the odd matchup, the game has been extremely well balanced. Each nation has its own ups and downs
Germany has arguably the best LMG’s (ignore capacity) and the best tanks. Their SMG’s tend to be par at best, but they make up for that with the Assault Rifles at the end of the line. Their planes are oftentimes nonexistent in matches
Russia has the best SMG’s and solid Auto Rifles. Their LMG’s, from what little I’ve used a couple of them, seem to have really high recoil and their lower tier planes feel less nimble than US planes
US has, in my opinion, the best LMG’s and unrivaled air dominance. We have air supremacy in most matches. Our tanks range from ok to mediocre. Our SMG’s require discipline and skill to use, but man them Thompson’s shred if you know what you’re doing
Japan has an incredible selection of SMG’s. They also have the most maneuverable planes in the war. Fragile, but light enough to outturn anything. Their tanks have no armor, but one or two have a good cannon on them
Each nation has pros and cons. You want to play a certain way? There’s a faction with strengths in that style. Want to play with specific weapons? You can, and oftentimes you can dominate with them regardless of what the enemy has given you have enough skill. There is a counter for every nation’s strengths (which is oftentimes a bomb) and there are ways to get around your nation’s weaknesses (such as choosing to not use tanks)
But yet I’ve seen people use the historical aspect over and over like a broken record
So I played quite a few matches today to get a better feel to make sure things haven’t changed recently. Nope, Japan (BRII anyway) and Russia (BRV) are horrible. I’m not saying they aren’t balanced on paper, I’m saying the matches are crap. Being #1 on my team at the end of every game doesn’t matter if the game play is horrible.
Played quite a few matches as USA and it was hit or miss. First 2 games I played the USA stomped, not balanced. The Last 2 I played they where very narrow losses, very balanced.
I’m telling you people. It’s the playerbase. We need to even out a lot more
Not even in 1945 should they lose every game.
You are a bit of a moron really.