They could fly from outside the map and maybe even be intercepted by enemy aircraft
7 Likes
I want to be able to destroy tanks in the gray zone with V1 or V2 rockets.
9 Likes
I hope I like the idea and it has to be exclusive to the Axis
1 Like
Yeah, V2s were definitely wasted on frontline soldiers. It’s not like frontline was in range of bombers.
5 Likes
This topic has the same energy as : “American radioman can call Nuclear bomb strikes”
17 Likes
Sure - you get 1 hit somewhere … on or off the map - completely random… your side or theirs… since you can only aim them at a city…
3 Likes
You do realise V1 and V2 rockets were only used as long range missiles to attack cities right?
As others have said why not just use bombers??
Personally I think given how weak and ineffective current AA guns are air strikes should be reduced from 5 aircraft to 3. That way its actually possible to shoot them down.
At the moment you need around one whole magazine to shoot a bomber. Youve then got a looooonnngggg reload by which time the bombers are far away. If youre lucky you might get one more but theyve already done their damage. Turret traverse leaves much to be desired as well.
it’s a video game, It doesn’t need to make sense, it’s the same as rare weapons like the fg-42 being found in large quantities on the battlefield
enlisted is a video game in case you forgot
Well, I’d argue that. V2 is just obscene idea. But of course it’s always matter of personal preferences.
Let the man have fun later we add nukes to US radio operator and he will regret it on his own 
Oh in that case let me get my nuke then for US then since it’s “just a game”
1 Like
No I didnt forget, its a stupid idea. Why not just use bombers? It would also be overkill. Explain to me what a V1 or V2 would actually do in game?
Also how would you shoot them down? AA guns wouldnt work, I believe the P51 could just catch up to the V1 rocket but not the V2. That means only people with a P51 can shoot them down. What would the Soviets get??
And as others have said since you think because its a game we should have anything yeah lets have standard infantry GI call in nuclear bombs all the time. The epicentre of an atom bomb alone would destroy the entire map.
LOL I saw a suggestion for teams to surrender if the game’s going really bad and others said that would ruin it by people just giving up straight away well yeah lets have nukes so some noob can just troll the game and destroy a whole round.
I also find it really interesting that people were dead against even just adding slouch hats or other Commonwealth uniforms as appearance options (Commonwealth forces were very active in WWII) yet support ballistic missiles in a game where they wouldnt work with how the game is made, and are completely inaccurate to how they were used.
Likewise people hate on proposals of the Korean War (where 98% of the weapons were from WWII and are already in game) yet support these stupid rockets.
Gamer’s logic astounds me.
Those pesky greyzone tankers do not anticipate to receive a tactical nuke in the face, using a plain probably will be more effective and faster, always appreciate “CoH-like” suggestions
It would be for the exclusive use of the Axis fortunately