German plane to balance out recent Ally weapon additions

HS 129 aka the Panzerknacker, fitted with an onboard semi automatic rotary drum loaded Bordkanone 7.5 (75mm gun)
HVAR rockets are obscenely overpowered and now allies have both gotten tanks on par with the King Tiger along with other fantastic event and tree weapons while we have basically nothing competitive at all since the APC event. Time to give German mains some new toys.

4 Likes

That would be a nice addition,but A,it would lack in anti infantry power,and B,the 37mm AP on the BF110 has been broken forever and DF has refused to touch it,so I doubt the 75mm have a similar problem to the 37mm.

Worst part is that they already found out why it is broken. AKA parameters missing for pen to exist.
But somehow they still did not fix it…

2 Likes

this or the other duck was tried to in tunisia cbt it would not fly at all

21cm are x3-x4 more powerful than an HVAR on an induvial level just that it’s 10v4

no, the pershing and jumbo 76 are both very very much inferior to KTH (P was always more balanced) with pershing being more similar to tiger 1 than KTH so yeah germany still has tank advantage

also fun fact: the ju-188 (a german aircraft) has the largest payload in the game

4 Likes


Was in tunisia testing

“In the field the B-3 proved effective, but its small numbers had little effect on the war effort.” - Wikipedia entry

On an individual level they are slightly weaker sure, but your high tier fighter has 8 and a full second faster turn time vs our 2 wfr gr21s on the FW190, the area you can cover against infantry is significantly larger on a plane that is already significantly better. Your BR5 attack plane has 10 rockets vs our 4 AND a 500lb bomb on top of that AND a ~1 second better turn time AND higher max speed than our rocket Fw190 fighter. Our bf 109s may be better pure fighters, but that basically doesn’t matter in this game because everyone who plays US just suicide bombs into the ground from spawn with them.

Both the M26 and IS 2 have bigger main cannons which are better for anti infantry, the KTH has better armor which is better in tank to tank fights. Both tanks can still kill KTH with a single decently placed shot from the front. The degree of advantage is much smaller than between aircraft or our infantry vs soviet infantry with body armor.

2 Likes

The b2 only had a 3.7 BK, (37mm), about half the size of the 7.5 BK

I’m not talking about IRL, because IN GAME the 37mm version of the duck was removed because it couldn’t fly at all, and last time I checked a 75mm semi-auto cannon is more heavy than 37mm cannon

i don’t know why you are saying “my” when i never mention if i main a fact, unlike you who clearly mains germany (i tend to play whatever my friends drags me to). max speed also means fuck all in this game since it’s based upon the optimal altitude for the engine, it’s why lower altitude fighters are usually able to catch up to the the planes that should have a higher max speed, ki-84 is the best plane in the game for this reason, for the 190s they are just fucked for no reason even in WT…I would use the 110g-2, br 3 attacker, to be the aircraft more similar to the jug with the difference being instead of a bomb the attacker in question has 2 mk108 30mm autocannon and 37mm autocannon; these cannons can shred both aircraft and infantry alike giving the 110g-2 more time around before resupply. the airframe of 110g-2 is near similar to the jug with both struggling to break 420kmph on the deck.

it’s clear you are talking about the western alliance and not russia so why bring up IS-2? however, yes I do agree that IS-2 is balanced against KTH. Now Pershing’s HE really isn’t much more effective than KTH while KTH has a faster reload so it too is better for anti infantry. Only the IS-2 and KTH can knock each other out with a decent shot to the turret, while the Pershing MUST uses it’s HVAP on the turret and is the case in WT would be a hit or miss for HVAP/APCR doesn’t create spalling at all.

oh my god, your 13.2 damage rifle loses a staggering 1.32 damage against a solider who has 10 hp before going down, the HORROR THE HORROR!!! I also know you are going to mention “b-but muh crutch perk”

What tank ? Super Pershing is still to be added.

1 Like

That seems like a problem with the game that can be fixed considering they worked just fine in real life.

Mostly for convenience of comparison, from the perspective of a german player I can say anything else in game isnt “mine”. I am sorry that offended you for whatever reason

I don’t know about how the back end works, sorry for assuming the stat was there for the sake of meaningful comparison at a comparable altitude due to being put in a stat list

Yeah I take the Bf 110 over the FW190 a8 due to how shit it controls, no point trying to use it as a fighter. The cannon on it is decent for infantry, but its aoe isn’t even comparable to either type of rockets, can’t kill tanks in high br and still has significantly worse turning than comparable American planes.

I care significantly less about tanks honestly, I just know that both can kill KTH from the front without too much difficulty and the allies have the King Pershing coming soon as well.

An extra bullet from most smgs in a game heavily dominated by smgs, especially in the tighter Soviet maps, is a pretty big deal.
You seem to know that too by your reaction to that statement.

1 Like

would be nice if they fixed the 190 flight models.

and put some bombs on their fighters.

2 Likes

Im a fan of the Duck, and I did enjoy busting tanks with it in Tunisia testing.

its the reason I bought the BF110 C-6

but they have broken HVAP rounds for the longest time now, which really hurts.

that is does. Personally I still think its junk. Its an easy kill for any opposition fighter/attacker thats paying attention (which I suppose is a lot to wish for in Enlisted).

3 Likes

Meserschmitt 262 Meserschmitt 262 Meserschmitt 262 Meserschmitt 262 Meserschmitt 262

4 Likes

It Will have a high speed But a very Bad turn speed sadly but compensated with very good canoons

Not really, it actually turns and maneuvers very well (warthunder). The main issue is acceleration and climb rate… if you burn off all your speed by turning too much, then you will have issues.

But if you manage your energy and speed well, its quite nice to fly

The other downside in warthunder is low velocity cannons which suck in 3rd person fast pace combat where shooting starts anywhere from 1.2 km to 800 meters. Not really an issue in enlisted

I look forward to making some clips of doing some serious damage in this beast…

Excuse me? No, this is not true. The pershing and 76 jumbo are definitely way worse.

1 Like

yeah we have the best tanks but sadly the enemy have well a long list of weapons that can destroy tanks easily

Sure, A-20 has 2 bombs less. Still, ~1000kg of bombs.
But for some odd reason people dont use it over HVAR’s.
I can only guess its because they still havent figured out how OP bombs are in enlisted.

1 Like

Bro it would out class any American fighters the US Russia didn’t have jets

no it really won’t, it would have a hard time acerating on these maps