Armaguerra = 1 hit down ->but body armor turns it into 2 hit down
German SMGs = 2 hit down, armor turns it into 3 hit down
Body armor is literally the main issue.
3 Likes
Let’s still remove the effect of the bulletproof vest. I don’t know if it’s powerful, but at least let the community have a moment of peace.
4 Likes
I would personally shit can the game’s body armor as I don’t think it was widely used in ww2. So, unless it is going to be offered to all factions, it needs to go.
4 Likes
Shoot aim in the head, sometime they wear white small bean cap. it’s pretty spot on. Hurahh
1 Like
Hey, some things in the game never actually appeared during World War II, but they are still present and active in the game.
1 Like
Yeah Body armor should be cosmetic
9 Likes
Both are bad designs in favor of soviets, body armor is the big issue but not as big as their smgs that are vastly superior. You just can’t compete with Urugan or PPS-42/43 with your crappy MP40 and Armaguerra is vastly inferior to Fedorov Rifle that can 1hk at the body shot. Once you go outside of 20-30m radius you can no longer 2 hit anyone anyway you need 3 or 4 hits. So that increased dmg of Smgs are irrelevant.
3 Likes
Yeah because soviets can’t headshot with their superior smgs. While also being protected like jrpg protagonist with permament +10% less dmg buff that can also bounce tank MG rounds/sniper rounds or any kind of rounds from time to time.
Soviets BR2 are playing Persona 5, While Axis BR2 are playing Dark Souls
4 Likes
Customizations should not affect the game, the impact of helmets and body armor should be removed.
5 Likes
A day without oppression cuirass 0
3 Likes
All damage reduction of armours should be removed. Period.
They’re a poor simulation of how WW2 armour really worked, chestpieces only worked against shrapnel and pistol caliber bullets (and then not even that effectively, it’s not like those chest peices were covering a lot and they weighed a ton), those chestpeices saving soldiers from semi-automatic rifle fire is just dumb. Also helmets really only worked for falling shrapnel and since the game doesn’t simulate that its damage reduction too shouldn’t be in the game.
Btw did you know none of the Japanese helmets apply a damage reduction?
This is the way to go.
6 Likes
This should apply to everyone. They should just be for beauty.
2 Likes
To many things I think. 
Few people know how the conflict with cuirasses was born, but initially everything went with MP40, which has 0.2 more damage than usual, which is supposedly imba in comparison with PPS43. Then we put forward a successful counter-thesis, which is that cuirasses give an even greater advantage. From that moment on, chaos began… 
I think this problem can be solved simply: we need to increase the damage of rifles: armaguera, gever41, fg422 to 15.3
1 Like
Terrible Idea - despite me advocating for it myself in the past, every weapon that gets buffed because of body armor makes Germany also more effective against Allies - which have no armor.
1 Like
The Gewehr41 isn’t the best rifle anyway, it has a terrible reload, and its damage is also less than that of the М1 Garand.
if we could say: gever41 is a great rifle but the cuirass makes it weak, but no, that’s not true and without the cuirass it’s a terrible rifle
1 Like
Gewehr 41 also need reload speed buff as it’s the slowest reloading rifle at BR3. Armaguerra need big buff not just to dmg but reload speed and recoil it’s completely inferior to Fedorov and M1 Carbine (got buffed twice).
1 Like
Honest question, IF BR3 SVT also had a clip reload, we would have G41, SVT and M1 Garand at BR 3… would it make sense in return to give all 3 the same 15.3 dmg? Right now only M1 Garand has high damage, but if only reload speed and mag capacity would be different, I do think that all 3 guns would be very comparable right?