Game suggestion #5 (new weapons)

Suggestions
1

1.Soviet Union needs more and stronger pass weapons（battle rate V）

2.need BM-13 Katyusha

3.need IS-3
IS-2 and Tiger II things
I have explained this question many times because the Tiger King should never have fought alongside IS-2 or Pershing
German tanks with lower br can easily penetrate the IS-2, but none of the Soviet tanks with lower br can penetrate the Tiger King
The difference between IS-2 and KV-1 in front of the 88mm tank gun is that one can counterattack and the other cannot, It’s like giving a 5-year-old child a knife and making him fight boxing champion Tyson, it’s not fair at all, Don’t say this is in line with history, the IS-2’s production in history was almost eight times that of the Tiger King tank
Since Japan can already use tanks that have not been used in combat in history, the Soviet Union should also be able to use the IS-3. In the Thunder of War, this tank has the same br as the Tiger King

4.need RPzB 54 Panzerschreck

5.need RG-42 grenade

3 Likes
2

IS-3 wouldn’t be a significant improvement. 122mm cannon is just way too limiting in Enlisted. You are forced to play passively.

I would rather go for tech tree T-44-100 or IS-100 (object 248).

And then go for ISU.

But I am definitely not against IS-3, I just don’t think that’s all the Soviets need. Because it still the same gameplay of IS-2, just slightly improved.

3 Likes
3

Worst thing you could suggest.
If Soviets get IS-3 than what will Germany get, Jadgtiger, E-100 or Maus? Soviets digging their own grave.

US hasn’t even received the promised Superpershing yet not to mention that people already hate Ho-Ri for being a papertiger so what do you expect Japan to get to counter the IS-3?

8 Likes
4

I am pretty sure Germany will get JT at some point. It was/is in game files/editor.
And I even remember James to hint something about tiger 2 with 105. But he could be just joking, I am not sure.

5

Jadgtiger had 128mm gun.
Its possible that he was talking about the StuH42 which does have a 105mm gun.

6

No, I am speaking of Tiger 2. (It was removed from WT since only blueprint existed and the idea was immediately discontinued)

But I think this comment was even before announcement of Super Pershing. It is not recent. And probably just joke.

7

I don’t remember anything about that so IDK.
Lots of promises were made around that time.

1 Like
8

Irony.

Well if they’re going to add it, they are most likely gonna make it premium… which sucks for me.

1 Like
9

Maybe, we used to have Jagdpanther on Tier5 but it was removed about the same as supposedly this happened

10

Jagdpanther was removed because they wanted to update its model and overall look. (At least that’s what James told us)

Which they already have done.

But they promised to put it back in the store once the improved look will be implemented. (But obviously that hasn’t happened yet).

11

That’s not really true. In Enlisted the following tanks can penetrate Tiger II (H) on the following weakspots:

SU-85M can penetrate Tiger II (H) on cupola and on MG-port
SU-100 can penetrate Tiger II (H) on cupola, turret and MG-port
T-34-57 (1943) can penetrate Tiger II (H) on cupola and on MG-port
T-34-85 can penetrate Tiger II (H) on cupola and on MG-port even with the 57mm ZIS-4M canon
M4A2 (76) W can penetrate Tiger II (H) on cupola and on MG-port
T-34-100 can penetrate Tiger II (H) on cupola, turret and MG-port
IS-1 can penetrate Tiger II (H) on cupola and on MG-port
KV-2 (both - premium and techtree) can shred the hell out of the Tiger II (H) also by hitting the turret frontally

KV-1 with ZiS-5 and T-34 (1941) / T-34E “STZ” with 76mm F-34 weren’t good enough. All in all I see enough tanks which can be a thread for a Tiger II (H)

12

Basically any tank can penetrate Tiger II from side to turret ring that’s only 30mm.
With strong enough explosive filler, it’s OHK.

13

I wasn’t talking about the side. I meant while Tiger II (H) standing frontal to the opponent.

14

Maus, E-100 and these should enter if they are given vehicles that did not fight in WW2

FB_IMG_1716309111687
FB_IMG_1716309111687736×1336 88.9 KB

15

The Jagdtiger would have no problem being added to the game as it is a vehicle that did see combat unlike the Soviet vehicles mentioned above.

16

yass
Just the T-34- :100: in tech tree would be an improvement, that tank is MEAN

17

That topic came up if not wrong I remember why the Allies were whining about the Tiger 2H and asking for Postwar Armaments like the Heavy Tanks to be added T-Series, T-29, T-30, T-32, T-34, Weapons like the Super Bazooka, a more armored variant of the Pershing, one with M8 rockets, etc.

18

:angry:

19

I always wondered if the E series really would have solved any logistical or mechanical issues.

Theoretically they share many components but I personally never thought they would have been viable for mass production while Germany was still at war.
The whole point was to replace aging platforms like the Panzer III and IV while also speeding up production and giving maintenance crews an easier time, but Germany had no resources to simply dumb thousands of good tanks and AFVs.

1 Like
20

What changes did they make? I cant see any difference