For us it would.
That are successful? None. Just like CRSED is not successful. Maybe consider not copying a failed game because that can result in your game failing as well.
1 Like
CRSED - battle royale game with magic, zombies, jetpacks etc.
Enlisted - WW2 game that is advertised as realistic
They share developer studio and assets, but gameplaywise they are very different from each other. So telling that third person view will work here because it worked in CRSED is not valid.
What makes Enlisted unique when compared to other WW2 FPS games right now is their squads mechanic and that realism we try to defend here. It’s just not another COD or Battlefield.
1 Like
If you want fresh, then perhaps you should look for something aside from multiplayer shooters.
Dont give me that bullshit “Good TPS game doesnt exist!”
So genre defining tactical shooters dont exist?
Arma, Ghost Recon.
Yeah, newsflash- greatest millitary simulation tactical shooter is in third person!
As for that CRSED and Enlisted are not same, do some reasearch how CRSED was made!
They dont share just “studio” and “assets”, but also animations, movement, enviroment, some models, etc!
I dont see what is problem for seperate third person mode?
Just dont play it and get over it.
≠ third person PvP shooter
Those games are in no way intended to be played like Enlisted is intended to be played.
That’s like saying real time strategy games with their orbital camera imply a WW2 game needs an orbital camera as well
Yet not the same core game design. It doesn’t matter how much of it is the same. They are not intended to be the same. Otherwise, Enlisted would have been an CRSED DLC or extention or whatever.
The fact it would take away at least 100 work hours from the developers to make, costing over 10.000$ not accounting for bugfixing, which we as a playerbase need to feed back into the system, meaning potentially more predatory monetization systems etc.
Ok, since you like breaking down in quotes, let me indulge you:
this → ≠ is symbol for time, dont use it anywhere!
Says you, they are tactictical shooter that aspire to realism.
whatever the fuck you mean.
My line is answer to your “they just share developer and assets” and funny how you used words as “DLC” since practical CRSED is Aprils fools Enlisted update, that ppl loved so they decided to move it to a diff game.
Thats just too dumb to answer buddy, sorry…dont mean that you stupid, just saying that your sentence has no reason behind it.
But anyway, dont hate something if you dont play it.
I for instance miss peripheral sign in all FPS games, Im professional firefighter for 13 years and I use peripheral sight all time when working.
FPS view doesnt have peripheral sight (well, it has if you have 3 monitors hooked up).
While I agree that corner peeking is bullshit (again, CRSED was SAME GAME at start and they found inovative solution for that, im sure they could find something similar), TPS gives me that FOV i need and yeah customisation is NOT a bad thing, its better that they monetise cosmetics than units!
My fault!
for a second I was thinking you used this ҂ symbol, sorry!
No. CRSED was never intended to be part of Enlisted. It was a teaser as to what was to come, before going into an entirely different direction. Third person makes somewhat sense in a battle royale game, as you are alone and need much more situational awareness there compared to a team based FPS game.
We have to pay for everything they work on in one way or another. Rather not spend unneeded development time on an mostly unwanted feature.
Then why not just ask for a higher FoV setting like any other normal person would? The community has been asking for that for a while and it has much more chance to make it into the game. It would also cost a lot less.
It is even confirmed that it will come in newest devblog
oh really? must have missed that. Pog
How about playing Battle Groud? This is pretty good TPS game