No friggin way. Go play some other twee crap.
2 Likes
despite what the other say, i personally would like a game mode in third person.
like, a separate game mode. not for the main one though.
No.
4 Likes
You are not in a position to ask for a first-person view
if u wana play TPS then change a game…
In real life u dont have TPS, so u can blame car factory to give u TPS…
This thread should be locked a and word TPS banned!!!
2 Likes
No, no, a thousand times no!
2 Likes
absolutely no to 3rd person view. For both vehicles and soldiers as well
2 Likes
The developers made this game only in first person so it will feel authentic and well realistic. If you don’t playing first person shooters whether its realistic or arcade, then at least there are other genres for you out there. Sure there are games like Squad or Hell Let Loose or anything of the sort, however those games were made to authentic and real too to capitalize that you are in a real war and adding something like a TPV in this set genre would take people out of the experience especially since its already set in stone that it will only be in first person.
2 Likes
Hell even on of the game’s taglines is this:
5 Likes
So to answer your question, no there should not be a third person mode, and if you don’t like it, play another game. Thank you.
5 Likes
I would say no to 3rd person camera because it gives a situational advantage to players in cover, encouraging camping. This is precisely the weakness of tanks and hiding in cover, you gain survivability but lose situational awareness. They have alternative viewports for vehicles but even then they give a glimpse to the outside. Even without considering current balance, anti tank soldiers depend on surprise to destroy tank and that surprise becomes unachievable once the tanker gains a 3rd person camera. Same happens to campers where they can no longer be surprised.
I personally would be fine with an arcade mode like you mentioned, or some other type of mechanic (Rainbow Six: Vegas?) to give you a third person camera but call me a puritan, I don’t like mixed 1st/3rd person cameras in shooters – players always use the system that gives them the greatest advantage and it’s always 3rd person.
2 Likes
Third person is not good for a game that tries to be realistic. You will get corner peeking behavior, and you will literally be at a disadvantage if you try to play immersively with first person. It may give you more enjoyment, but will ruin it for many, many people who play this game for the immersion.
Further ruins it with artificial spotting.
Then just… don’t play them, and play a third person shooter instead?
End of World? Maybe not. End of enlisted? Definitely.
I’ll give you the ability to go back to that cuisine royale you love
That’s a you issue. Not enlisted issue.
Not there, because immersive first person shooter genre isn’t ment to be played in third person?
Entire gamemode for one or two dudes per thousand players?
Big nope for me.
3 Likes
A big NO from me as well.
In my opinion realism isn’t based on the camera view.
There is a difference between realism and simulation.
Real means things behave and act like they do in real life, but that doesn’t mean we have to use first person view, you already have “respawning as a different soldier” and many other “non realistic things in the game”
I think first person view is great, but I would like the option to swap between first and third person view freely…
perhaps add a simulation game mode that locks you into first person mode,
removes kill cam, removes hud, removes death marks, removes minimap, removes kill feed, removes objective markers, each solider gets one life… ect…
Its funny you assume only two dudes per thousand people want third person camera, when the biggest games in the world all are non first person.
I cant name a single multiplayer shooter thats third person thats popular thats come out in the last 5 years
Fortnite?
Well among all forum posts, I’ve seen a grand total of 2 people request this.
I mean fair. That is indeed one lol
1 Like
Stuff like killcam, HUD, minimap and all that of the like, yes they should be taken out should they do like a hardcore style mode, oh and friendly fire should be on too. But yeah I do get where you are coming from.
I agree with you.
Third person mode would be awesome, but as a seperate mode.
Problem is that everyone jumps in like “It ruins immersion!” “Not realistic” etc.
CRSED is almost same game (who played knows) and there TPP works fine
In my opinion, TPP would fresh up game and NO it would not ruin the game, only thing that can ruin this game is being faceless in a ocean of FPS WW2 games.
Lets play a game:
How many WW2 FPS games are there?
Now how many WW2 TPP games are there?
EXACTLY!
So dont be mindless bot with cockblocking expansion of this game if there grows idea for separate third person mode, because it would be fresh and new!
There is nothing fresh and new about FPS WW2!