at first i assumed they would be OP, but after testing them and seeing others play them…the whole squad is just ok. the primary weapon sucks hard (hopefully the british one is better) and the flamethrowers only have 100 fuel.
EDIT: and they dont even have fire resistence like normal flamers have.
5 Likes
They already announced this, in some days the range and kill power become more or less equal to flamethrowers 1
Oh really?
You have a link?
1 Like
thx mate
I wouldnt mind them being a t1 flamer (aligns with the rest of their kit). I dont intend to use it anyway.
But as long as that makes them a low BR cos 20 round smg belongs at low BR
1 Like
They will definitely not be a low BR. This weapon is decent and it has 20/140 rounds.
I cannot imagine this squad being low BR. It’s definitely higher mid BR.
1 Like
Cough cough Normandy thompsons 100 rounds 6 man squad and Vickers 100 rounds 6 man squad Yep nothing wrong there Especially for the Vickers.
4 Likes
Having not used them yet ill take your word for it
I have no doubt i will like it and find it decent, as i also like the mp28…but 20 rounds definetly gets replaced quick by the plethora of higher capacity mags.
Yeah the OG-43 is kind of rubbish they need to buff the damage or fire rate or give it a bigger magazine.
3 Likes
they should be removed
droping from airplane and able to set the cap point on fire.
is too op.
For me personally, this squad is more usable than German event one.
Flamethrowers vs GLs?
120/40 vs 20/40?
FG isn’t that good to save that squad. Italian squad suits me and my gameplay way more. It’s just very close combat oriented (and you need get advantage of surrounding, you need to cover yourself a lot while reloading)
And in my opinion is way better. You can’t really be a very aggressive with FG GL.
I would be very surprised if this squad would end up on low BR.
Btw. In my humble opinion, para class shouldn’t be a low BR thing at all.
2 Likes
removed?they have to grab their flamethrowers under fire if they land on a point,and their weapons is TERRIBLE,it’s an FNAB 43 with half the magazine and awful sights
5 Likes
From my subjective perspective, I really liked its sights. They’re very comfortable and I could kill someone even on 60m+. But I always wasted nearly one full mag, sometimes even more.
Terrible sights has Reising, not this weapon. But I know this can be very subjective.
2 Likes
i’m just tired about people trying to nerf these paratroopers just because they have a flamethrower, they have a bad gun,you have to open the box to get the flamethrowers,they don’t have increased fire resistance like normal flamers.to be honest,this will more than likely be another inferior axis paratrooper,this needs to stop,giving the allies stupidly broken high fire rate guns for the paratroopers while the axis get a gun with 1/4 the magazine and dinky grenade launchers that does almost no damage
4 Likes
you can visibly see with the rising though,but like you said,it’s objective
2 Likes
The OG-43 would be a decent SMG if it didn’t have to compete against Thompsons with nearly twice its ROF and mag size
7 Likes
Not all paratroopers make it to the supply crate especially when they’re against players
How else are they supposed to make money they’re trying to appeal to the American player base they’re the ones who spend big bucks.
1 Like
meh, I dunno.
Sure like ppl say, flamers tiers 2 is a bit much but it will be fixed to tier 1 flamers.
And they have very bad smgs (compared to literally all other Tunisia smgs). with 20 ammo per magazine, it’s just a worse FNAB, the almost starter Normandy smg.
So are they that OP, once they get flamers tier 1 instead of tier 2, with 100 units of fuel per tank?
I’m not sure.
Edit: (I see this the same way as ppl complaining about the Normandy fg42 with grenade launcher. For some reason, nobody talk about them anymore…)
3 Likes