First Panther

Mess Room
21

9.2?

22

I unlocked Panther G more than year ago :sleeping:

23

Soviets are not fighting Allies, lol. And definitely do not have CAS nearly as strong as allies do.

And finally, Pershing is way better than both T-34-85 and Panther.

I really do not understand your anti Soviet tank pushes everytime someone mentions anything different than SU or ISU lol.

24

then what panther are you talking about?
edit nvm I didn’t realize this post is about t34 100
 smh

25

Because it is not fun tank to play. Especially if you are active tanker.

And idk what you meant by Soviet mains. Since Soviets are literally faction I have the least time invested in.

26

I wasn’t talking about you, but literal Soviet mains that only have IS-2 unlocked so they don’t understand the weaknesses and strengths of other BR5 tanks so they cry for IS-3 because in their logic: more armor → better.

27

hype aside
 Still German tank can take you out and kind tiger 2 is a beast frontally, objectively this tank is not a game changer and do what the normal T34-85 already do, the true game changer would be the T44-100 or IS3M

2 Likes
28

Okay, I apologize then. But you were replying to me.

Well, both are going to have the same playstyle. IS-3 is going to be just straightforward upgrade to IS-2. But nothing more.

The issue I had with IS-2 is that it’s gameplay just isn’t fun for me.
And the only other usable option is T-34-85 for high BRs. You simply do not have many things to choose from.

Meanwhile Allies do have several Shermans, Pershing and Hellcat.

That’s why I lobbied for tank with more different play style and proposed IS-100, T-44-100 and T-34-100. SU and ISU wouldn’t have very different playstyle from IS-2 imho.

29

This new tank easily penetrates Tiger 2.

30

Sigh
 I mean a true game changing in tank power come if developers add more advanced tank for soviet like T44
 currently “hype aside” there is no difference in armor power between the two

31

To be honest? if we tolerate so many prototype infantry weapons, its kinda silly that we don’t allow more tanks to get introduced


Panther II, IS3, T44, T29, Superpershing could theoretically work for the game, the main complaint however is that the game should stay WW2 I guess


2 Likes
32

I completely agree with you.

1 Like
33

i mean i already have IS2 from GO so anyway i only need the tool to kill tiger that all tbh (beside i got 2 tiger 2 yesterday im pretty sure)

34

Against Tiger II, All you need is panzerfaust as Soviets tbh

1 Like
35

Honestly I never have issue in kill tiger with the T34 or is2, once you blow up the turret you have all the time for aim and ammo rack them

36

i mean i do have skill issue so it hard for me but IS2 and possibly this thing might help me improve a bit more

1 Like
37

It’s not that I don’t want new vehicles for sovs.

It’s that boos claiming sovs “suffer” or “desperately needed” something when they did not (claiming their stuff are bad), is getting old.

As allies, They fight axis, like sovs do. Their tanks are really meh compared to axis ones, and Pershing is at best counterpart to panther or tiger 1 (need super Persh). Is2 1944 could go toe to toe with kth easily.

3 Likes
38

I want new vehicle for sov like IS3M so we can get the E50 for Germany and the American T34

39

Eh, Idk. Becoming a bit too power creep. We’d see stuff like E75 for Germany and at that point
 ppl think KTH is a wall, now e75 is just obscene.

I admit I like t34 for USA but
 then again that’s a death star lvl canon :neutral_face:

Idk, I’m not a fan of power creep.

1 Like
40

Power creep isn’t problem as long as implementation of these tanks would meant BR6 and ±1/±0 MM.

But in current state of the game, those tanks definitely wouldn’t be good idea.

Not counting T29, Allies should definitely get it as last BR5 tank.

1 Like