i always use it. it a pretty decent tank imo
In Berlin? Or in Normandy? Both are crap either way
on normandy but then again maybe i got a lucky match
Well, it’s not a matter of changing their BR, it’s a matter of learning how to destroy them. It’s as easy as placing a detpaq in its turret and the problem is over.
Unless they give every PZ3N a HEAT rounds (which was the case in a test server) then it’s a very bad change.
Looks like more bad placements
oh i did suggest this but i guess people can use edit or something but in practice on test server there is only 1 tiger 2 and tiger 1 i think increasing the amount would help people learn where to shoot them
like when i go to try the IS1 i have to reset the practice map a lot since there is only 1 tiger 1 and tiger 2 for some reason
point is i dont want to keep quitting and re joining just to try to see where is the most reliable spot
No, it looks like good changes, they brought US on par with Axis/USSR. Good changes.
and the better HEAT rounds. the 100mm pen ones, not the 80mm ones they currently have.
80mm can still get it done. But 100mm better
KV 1 will be alright on tier 3 as long as there is an additional mechanic in matchmaking that prevents one-sided presence of tier 3 vehicles (for example if a KV 1 gets into tier 1-3 battle, there must be a player with a long barrel Pz IV also put in that battle to counter it)
HEAT has 80mm pen, and the 90mm pen GrB 39 can’t even scratch the KV1 flat on… so not great
That player got connection refused, now what? Rest of team deserts in solidarity?
Balancing matches on 1-2 players, what can go wrong with no map-veto
I dont think that is in place. On the test server We had BR 2s on our team against mulitple BR 3s.
Hard to tell with no population on the test server though.
yea it was a weird time there
I’ve sometimes detonated KV-1 with the GrB. Hitting the armor at the right angle allows penetration but I can agree IT is sometimes quite hard to do, especially from a larger distance.
anyway i thought the mkb would be more controversial since those are still br4 right? i didnt check it when the test server was live so i wouldnt know
Tried that on high ground against the slightly sloped turret side(75mm btw), the grenade land flat on the ammo, multiple times no damage, when I did damage it, the ammo stays red and didn’t explode
I played in Stalingrad and the kvs I encountered died after 1-2 shots from a long-barreled 75mm cannon. Maybe you have a skill problem and are trying to shoot at the hull instead of the turret or mech driver
BR5, same for Kilary and MAB 38A 40rnd which both are SMGs
Now USA is the most powerful mid tier nation in a game. You have BAR, Colt Monitor, old BAR premium squad, now M1 Garand, M1 Carbine with nade launcher, multiple Shermans and even Sherman 105mm (you can use M8 Scott plus that Sherman for complete obliteration of the infantry), two paras too.
Did anyone thought for a second that Axis has only has a single good gun at that BR which you just increased to BR3? which was VG 1-5, Gewehr 41 reloads way toooooo slow to be used vs M1 Garand, our mg34 is much weaker than BAR/Monitor at the job of clearing points and fighting at the mid range, our smgs are also much much weaker compared to Thompsons mp40 is now dead, we lost mid tier paras to BR4, while USA can just deploy two paras in same match of BR1-3 how fun…
There will be also unkillable KV-1 at the low-mid BR matches how fun… Imagine being a newbie with a crappy AB41 fighting this thing. We need universal Heat for PZ3N no matter if you had Stalingrad FA or not, plus i hope Pz4F2/G has the same BR as KV-1.
Axis now become second worst nation in a game only leaving Japan behind, we can’t compete against Soviet infantry weapons at any br, low-mid tier is also getting blasted by Americans with their superior toys. I know you hate Germans but this is too much. And why taking PZWF42 to tier 4 if mini Katyusha is still at BR3 or lower. Soviet and American bias as always.