You’ll just fighting over some girls in video game what’s the point of the argument
Maybe these documents folls too?
This is Lidiya Litvyak missed in action report.
What else?
Maybe 27 millions died are false? 17 millions of them are civilians. Maybe you tell me that is false too? Child’s, old people, sisters, mothers.
Died parent in every Russian family. In 99 per cent of familys. Is this a folls too?
If you d like to discuss it come on, answer
for the same reasons that other titles has been ruined because of it.
my self, included others stated already the reasons above.
but someone does not accept simples no as answeres.
like, it’s a game after all. not a simulation. so i don’t see why it should matter in the first place.
the game is far from over, where bugs and issues are around the corner, and people worries about skins?
that explains quite abit.
Yes there were over 1.5M women in the red army but they were mostly Nurses and medics not front combat there are always special cases but they are SPECIAL the game isn’t even out yet let the devs finish with the normal soldiers and game and then start suggesting all of the special cases
All damage control that’s irrelevant to the topic.
As was said before the number given is far too high for even a shadow of it to not be backed up by firsthand accounts of russian soldiers.
You would think someone would say “wow there’s a lot of women in the army now” but it’s not the case.
What do you want to hear from me? I do not understand.
So all these documents, you try to tell, in my country during the war girls wouldn’t sign in voluntarily to a field medics? Send me some proof, I want to see it. Or you just suggest there was no female snipers, no medics, no pilots, cause someone told you all Russia says are folls?
And these girls are imposters?

I’m saying, again because you refuse to read, that the numbers you gave to use as an argument are vastly inflated and those photos are for propaganda, as there’s an extreme lack of personal soviet accounts of female soldiers.
I will bring you a statistics, no problem.
My position
- We all have the right to propose the concept or something that can be put into the game.So we were given a forum and an opportunity to speak out.
- The decision of what to implement into the game and what not is made by the game developers. They have the right to reject or accept whatever they want, based on the opinion of the testers or own one.
- We have rare types of weapons in the game. The developers have recently introduced premium units, the historicity of which is not refuted, but questionable. From which I conclude that developers are looking for ideas. I offer my idea.
- I propose such a concept - to add female fighters only on soviet side, relying on a historical fact. Whether they will be premium or from twitch drops or promotional or regular is an open question.
- If someone thinks that his voice is more important - I say - no. All votes are equal and I propose and defend my opinion. Others can defend their opinions. If my proposal is not implement into the game, I will accept it calmly.
Total:
The proposal has a historical basis - yes
The proposal has the ability to implement - yes
Technically - will it make developers to draw something more than a new plane tank or a campaign in general - no
Do other people have the right to be against - yes
Do I agree if the developers (and not other testers) decide that the proposal is not a priority - yes
Am I ready that this will not be done tomorrow, but in half a year, a year, or never etc.? - Yes
What questions?
Historical basis- partial
Ability to implement- yes
Technical- probably
I agree with you on this neutral note. I expressed my opinion, you expressed your opinion, I saw it. The word for the developers. If they think they need to comment on this.
Why you’ll care so much about the way your Characters look?
Partial. There were women in the army - yes, with 99% of them being cooks, nurses, etc. Those count as being “in the army” as well but we do not see any cooks running around with a frying pan, do we? As such, the argument of “there were X women in the Soviet army” should be completely disregarded. Instead, we should look at individual combat units that had women in them, such as 586th-588th plane squadrons. But if we look at those, it shows they did not participate in Moscow. As such, I would only want a female fighter pilot if we had a Stalingrad/Kursk campaign where they actually could be present historically.
Yes, however, it would come at a cost that raises the question whether it should be prioritized over fixing other things.
Not enough to fight to the death. But I am not the only one who has the desire.
lol, again.
when someone is more worried of how the character looks like insthead of the nail gun he is using.
but hey, that’s allright.
There is little difference with Germany.
For comparison, I will give the number of female Wehrmacht servicemen in the positions of nurses, pilots, anti-aircraft gunners, mortar pilots, drivers, infantrymen, and so on. Well, there weren’t ANY of them. The Germans made do with male orderlies on the battlefield, and they were not allowed to enter the other female. Even when the war came to the territory of Germany, were is no facts of the participation of German girls in the Volkssturm, or in any intelligence and sabotage detachments of the Abwehr.
So I would like to see a female soldiers who was in battle IRL and those this thousands of documents is about. And there is no porpoise not to add females at su side. Only a sexism or bad knowledge of documentary approved history facts can avoid that.
Idk man berlin from what I seen berlin was full of front combat women
But again, who cares about the gender of your Character it gonna die anyway
how about NOT forcing in female combatants that dont actually add ANYTHING useful. Waste of resources that could go into fixing bugs or even a few new tanks
And unless you provide a document stating there were female COMBATANTS (not army members like cooks / nurses) actively fighting in Moscow, there aren’t any for the Soviets either.