Fedorov Avtomat for Stalingrad

Personally, I am hoping they introduce the Fedorov as a campaign unlock in the next update for Stalingrad. Extremely familiar campaign progression overall and making that gun available earlier on would have made the journey more exciting. What do you guys think?

2 Likes

This does make more sense in early war like Moscow and Stalingrad than Berlin where at that point, the gun was already obsolete in Red Army service. PPSh would work just fine for the Soviet assaulter III in Berlin.

1 Like

Personally I think Fedorov Avtomat should only be gold oder/premium squad weapon for Moscow or potential Winter War but should not appear after that in the timeline, since there is no way anyone would carry it instead of PPSh-41/PPS-43 .

2 Likes

No fedorov now is better than the mp43/I and is his counter, you want fedorov good so german can use time travel for obtain fg42 or stg44, right?

2 Likes

There is literally no difference between STG44 and MKB42H except how they look and sound. Btw, I believe they would add Fedorov in Moscow, LET ALONE stalingrad

1 Like

Fedorov is an assaulter weapon german currently dont have a counter so no, and no Fedorov to enginer avt 40 is already an overkill with upgrades

1 Like

And mkb42 is lot better then avt 40… So that time travel argument can be used to other way also…

1 Like

no, in my opinion avt40 can kill with one bullets even at 100m and more mkb need medium close range to work, so avt40 is all rounder, if you ask me i took an avt40 over an mkb all time

6 Likes

It is not and never will be, the Fedorov is just a sidegrade to the PPSh so you might aswell just use it instead.

Nope, both are different with the fedorov thanks do 10 stock damage you can use it for kill dude on the other side of the map, you cant with ppsh 5.5 damage, even because you get blind from keep firing

3 Likes

@Euthymia07 Chronic inability of pulling guns down

No you cant, the Fedorov fires at lower velocity than the MP-43, its damage falls off quite quickly.

I can, i dont want say this but skill issue? Only because fire slow don’t mean is a shit, otherwise no one can use mp28

4 Likes

Little Timmy here doesnt know the difference between comparing two weapons and actually saying that a weapon is bad, very sad.

Yeah it soviets who has problems controlling their guns, meanwhile there isnt even need to try control german weapons… not like devs are trying babbysitting or something…

He is bit salty cause his precious mp43 got ‘nerfed’ so ofcourse every allied player is crying now:D

1 Like

60 meters is across the map for you?

And who said anything about firerate? Can you not read aswell? I said velocity not firerate.

Yep enlisted playable area is max 100m for both so is across the map for me, and i use translator i cant read difference between if you dont explain better, if i translate velocity of fire and fire rate the word is velocita di fuoco= fire speed :rofl: so sorry about missreaded but, velocity of bullets in 100m dont mean nothing

1 Like

skill issue

6 Likes

Can you Soviet mains take the PPSH-41 in Moscow as a W and stop asking for a stronger assaulter weapon already?

1 Like

Some people should carry a plant around with them to replace the oxygen they waste.

5 Likes