I vote to restrict stacks from 4 to 3.
4 Likes
?, The hell did this happen at? I haven’t seen any clans or anything of note. Was it a custom match? It’s been pretty smooth sailing this game. Almost braindead easy. That almost 100% win rate isn’t coming from the air. Though, I don’t think it matters much at the end of the day like it did for me back in H&G.
Though I’m curious about these clans, maybe they are those “random” stacks that rage quit? Idk.
Be interesting to see those TAW boys back in action.
1 Like
eh, good luck with that esports i guess
In customs ? I mean sure, go for it. Atleast in that case they could speak of somekind of competition when both “teams” are on same page about the competition.
If you just randomly every 100th game find a another clan in matchmake thats just pathetic.
Sure, hence where is the competition ? People seem to speak of “competive” here while winning against randoms with stacks is arguably same as Usain Bolt versus toddler in 100m sprint.
Sure, if someone is actually intrested of learning anything of the game.
Pretty sure that aint the case with majority of people in matchmake, they just enjoy the casual sandbox experience.
Well not really, as above mentioned Usain Bolt winning a toddler in 100m sprint is just pathetic, regardless he obviously would win while hes opponent would be happy with legos at starting line.
Yeah, i matched against a russian youtuber and both times his whole team was full of max rank. In all the matches i have done in the last 2 month i didn’t even encounter a full team of max rank one.
Little sus lol.
1 Like
It’s seems that you don’t have respect for other if you wanna have 10 stack to win ALL the matches and made the live of your opponent miserable. A 10 stack vs some random, ah yeah so much respect for your opponent.
2 Likes
2 stack can have the same matchmaking like everybody else 3-4 they match only with other stack and bot. Cold be great and fair.
Wat?
Sry but i don’t know on which of the 3 comment you responded.
juego con mi pareja enlisted y le aseguro que siendo solo dos ya es suficiente para hacer una ardua diferencia, cuando juego de a 4 es casi seguro que hay victoria asegurada, 10 ya sería demasiado descabellado, en todo caso si logra reunir 19 amigos recuerde que puede crear partidas personalizadas, si bien no es completamente lo mismo, puede acomodar factores para hacerlo más al gusto e incluso ir a mapas de mods.
I see some interesting comments, some really childish. The sad thing is that “solo” players don’t even question whether they might have to play with a group of friends. I’m sorry for you.
Looks a lot like fried pierogi.
My friends and I used to eat quite a lot of them in the middle school. Stuffed with cottage cheese and dipped in garlic sauce. Good times. (I got hungry.)
2 Likes
Utsunomiya’s gyoza is the best in Japan.
Hamamatsu is second.
You should admit this fact.
Dumplings and pierogi are almost the same thing. It’s strange that there are exactly the same dishes even though they are so far apart. 
2 Likes
No game is inherently “competitive”. The community of a game determines how “sweaty” a game is.
It is true that Enlisted has a very casual playerbase - but that doesn’t mean the game can’t be played “competitively”.
1 Like
You are a very special boy. Thanks for the thought!
No one minds if this game has more professionalism
But that doesn’t mean everyone wants to be run over by a large convoy.
Especially when 10 Captain Americas holding automatic rifles and driving P47s fight against 1 Nazi soldier and 9 monkeys
The best part is there will be experience penalties in the future
This means that you can only be constantly crushed or join them
Otherwise, you can only suffer an experience penalty and it will continue to affect your future experience gain.
The experience penalty just makes the game slowly commit suicide
Because the player distribution in this game is worse than Hitler’s drawing skills
Large fleets will speed up the process
1 Like
Nice, but that wasn’t my point. 
Enlisted is a team-based game and victory is a team-effort.
It is nothing wrong where a team build no rallies / use T-60 instead of IS-2 / sniping enemies from behind - that team will lose and they are happy with that.
However - that is the game all about - team effort. A team with better players wins and a team with more console-players and idiots lose.
If a stack of 4 cannot win against a team of solo players, increasing number of players in stack from 4 to 10 will not help them anyway.
2 Likes
Oh a fun fact! Those players that are lower on your leaderboard can EASILY be real, it’s simply due to the matchmaking only taking into account your current gear that allows for even the worse performing players to end up with the better performing players, which leads to those worse ones being stomped into the ground.
(I say this because I’ve seen countless bottom of the leaderboard players speaking or in a vehicle)
1 Like
It’s true, it’s abysmal playing against a team with max rank, let alone a team filled with premium paras, T-5 equipment and they’re stacked so high and deep, where is the fun in it?
I agree with you Reno, it’s apart of the game to win and lose. It’s the challenge that makes the game enjoyable!
Great seeing you in this comment thread 
1 Like