I think that when we get to the final version of the game, limiting teams to just 4 people is ridiculous. Enlisted is a “social” game where collaboration between users is fundamental. The few games I lose because maybe my teammates and I get 100 kills each, while from the fourth or fifth player onwards they barely get to 25 kills. Even more ridiculous if in the meantime the rest of my team is forced to play another game due to the absurd limitation to only 4 players.
3 Likes
Solo players don’t really like this idea
It’s already troublesome enough to suppress a team of 4 people.
Don’t let them become 10
I don’t want to fight with 9 monkeys
Being a deserter will result in less experience in the future
Imprisonment and future experience settlement are reduced, choose 1 from 2
Who can accept this kind of environment?
14 Likes
Imagine 10 vs 10 full teams, that would be potentially super sweaty - I would love that.
3 Likes
only if squads/teams fight other teams.
2 players can be teamed in casual matches, but more than 2 are very unfair against the other team.
14 Likes
No, it is not. We don’t even have lobby chat, lol. It is just your poor excuse for introducing even worse stack imbalance.
24 Likes
I mean, technically you can already “surprisingly reliably” queue up with multiple full teams at the same time and end up in the same match - I did that stuff before, and well… never losing and always having to fight over kills with your mates is potentially the most boring type of gameplay imaginable.
1 Like
Yea the day lobby chat is added is probably the same day bipod got fix I guess
6 Likes
True story lol
1 Like
So Enlisted’s problem now would be player teams? The problem is not the teams, but the players themselves. By continuing to play alone, without teaming up, joining discord servers, being “social”, no one will ever improve. We have already seen that the first competitive clams were born and that they organized the first clan war, and the situation will certainly get bigger. Why persist in playing alone? The first time I played Enlisted, after only a week I looked for a Discord server dedicated to the game.
1 Like
I don’t need to be carried.
Playing stacks will not improve you in any way. You just don’t need to carry as much as you need while playing solo.
It’s so funny when 4 stacks believe they are so incredibly skilled. When in reality they are literally afraid to play alone. Because there would be no one to carry them anymore. And then, they find out very quickly, that they’re not as good as they thought they were.
Creating “competitive” clans in a game that has literally zero support for competitive play is truly hilarious. There’s a reason why this type of players doesn’t play competitive games with actual real competition. And rather they boost their egos in non-mainstream casual games like enlisted.
I have no respect for such people.
9 Likes
When your quartet reaps 400 kills, it’s no wonder that every other player has a problem finding targets to shoot.
If it’s such a social game, please just find another 10 ppl and start your custom game.
Leave the rest of us alone. Stacks already suck.
Lmao. Just because you coordinate and likely play with above average players, doesn’t mean you individually improve at all. Playing in a stack is almost like cheating when comes to improvement and difficulty level, just so that we are clear.
3 Likes
4 people already have such an extremely huge impact on the match, adding more is simply broken
9 Likes
I bet that maybe…maybe just one of you was building rally point.
Now I’ll explain. I have no problem playing alone, in fact I’m often among the first without any problems. I’m bored playing with bad people. Also in BR5. The new system has a limit: even with just one BR5 weapon (perhaps taken with the gold card or with a premium team), but at the end of the day they are people who then “don’t play” if they get 25-40 kills in a difficult game, puoi avere anche 10 spawn, ma se ad esempio è un assault o una destruction, se giocate in 4 su 10 la modalità perde senso. The problem is above all, if we are 7 friends and we want to have fun together, why are we forced to divide ourselves into 2 different games?
You continue to make assumptions on people who are in clans like you know them which is disrespectful, many players in our clan (EVA) for example play other games within our discord. A group of friends who play together is something you seem to lack when writing on here people who stack are not just “clans” but friends who want to play with each other. My question to you is why is it when you’re in a game with someone you disagree with you leave said game? that’s not healthy for a growing game if you can’t stick it out for the rest of the team.
2 Likes
I do have several screenshots of your fellow clanmates insulting me or other players in public matches.
No further comment.
5 Likes
Interesting and amusing points here… Four is already enough. I mean, these are random matches with no impact whatsoever. Having this many players seems bizarre. If strategic map gets added, it might not be such a trash idea then. This idea seems like it is for those who are trash at this game, truly. Funny enough, the only bad thing I do is bring stacks (Though mostly me and a friend lol). But I never really need them, and once my Pershing’s get added, I might tell them to go away, lol.
Stacks make this game waaay too easy.
1 Like
Not before stacks are matched against similar stacks.
5 Likes
I cannot agree with this opinion.
Your idea that all players should be full of ambition and find friends on Discord is a very harmful and behind-the-scenes opinion in terms of trends in FPS games.
If your opinion is taken into consideration, it will drive away the casual players this game was originally supposed to attract. That would only hasten the death of this doomed game. So, this is an opinion that developers should not refer to.
Both Battlefield and CoD sought to improve their games with input from pro gamers and sweatlords. Try to remember how it turned out. All ended in failure. Everything.
That’s why we don’t rely on the opinions of some dedicated players in this type of game right now. Rather than having a game balance that only a few people can enjoy, everyone believes that it should be a little more rough-around-the-edges and enjoyable for many people.
One of the reasons for the success of Battlefield and CoD is that each player can freely participate in the game and enjoy teamwork based on contingency. Neither game requires players to use Discord or build relationships beforehand.
It’s a game you can play on weekend nights when you feel like it, either on your own or for impromptu cooperative play.
And this game definitely has a casual feel similar to Battlefield.
It’s a good idea to enhance social features within the game. It might be a good feature if you could have a quick chat in the lobby with someone you met today, or find someone you want to play with in-game and play with them for a few hours.
However, a game where the premise is “If you want to be a good player, gather friends on Discord in advance” is frankly a crap game.
I have friends who play games with me, and we play ArmA, Squad, and RoN. But you rarely do that in Battlefield, CoD, or Enlisted.
1 Like