That is why first day so many players want to play sv and Japan also have many unique weapons why use type 4 fight with svt？Not just use the same type of weapons is balance
5 Likes
I played the first two days, but decided I didn’t like the Fedorov event gun, and after winning the Thompson it now gives me four total, which is enough to field a squad and I didn’t want to have to suffer through several more nights just to get the other Thompson, so, I’m done after two nights. 
5 Likes
A player
Reply: Hmm. It’s not that many people are shouting about this post on forums. The degree of occurrence, I don’t think this post has many people gathering. If there are really so many people playing this activity, they should be criticizing the bunch of unreasonable designs created by the undercurrent. Whiteboard soldiers and whiteboard guns combined with unreasonable configurations. I haven’t seen much attention paid to the intensity of SVT38, which is a trivial matter. The strength of the second level room is better than G41. No one sprayed it either. This level 2 large bolt does not close enough to replace bullets and crush other level 2 axis semi-automatic guns. Rather than weakening the VT38, it is more accurate to say that the 38 performs normally. Japan originally had two gold card guns that could have been used for silver coins. One was a 10 round C gun, and the other was an experimental C. Both guns were loaded with magazines and had 10 rounds, making them semi-automatic guns. But the undercurrent was specifically ignored. Unfortunately, he came out with the worst gun and gave it to level three, including Germany. Even though the Johnson rifle in the neighboring United States has already been downgraded to level three, the G43, a gun with similar performance to the VT38, has not been downgraded… These pure and pure are all issues of undercurrent. We can’t just share the disadvantages together, but not the benefits
You are right，not necessity to play a shit.
3 Likes
The most obvious inequality is the B5N vs Su-2 - the Jap plane is just a target for both Soviet ones.
Should have given them the D3A - sure it’s a smaller bombload but it is a formidable dogfighter.
Dunno about he myriad infantry weapons - but Japanese rarely win - I think I’ve seen 1 game over 2 days where they did.
7 Likes
A1333 the Johnson is better then the g41 true but worse then the g43
The Johnson is equal to the type4
The svt38 is the best and needs to be nerfed by being stripper clip fed like all 10 round br3 sa
If you drop the g41 to br 3 you would need a new gun for us and japan
I don’t even try to win anymore, I stay behind with a sniper and let them poke their heads out, after all, no one plays this for fun.
The event could be a little better if it at least allowed us to sort squads and configure their perks.
3 Likes
Back when I first started playing Enlisted and had one Medic squad, a rifle squad and a sniper squad, I used to do almost nothing but snipe. I sucked (and still do) with a typical bolt action rifle, so, once my medics and their smg’s were dead, I could play almost the rest of the game with my snipers. Back then, if I had 20 to 25 kills, I thought I played good. 
2 Likes
your mean drop g43 to br 3 or just say the g41？
Yes was supposed to be g43, g41 is already br3, just buff g41 and nerf svt38. Moving g43 to br3 requires new br3 us rifle requiring new jp gun. No Johnson 1941 is not g43s equal. or you could down tier the g43 and switch the type 4, johnson from stripper clip to single action mag reload. Which is harder and breaks br2 br3 balance. johnson vs g43, accuracy same, mag same, damage same, rof same, reload jonson worse.
Why did they add Type 4 to Japanese soldiers, what’s wrong with Type 99 ?
Type 4 is best used as melee weapon.