Enlisted will need test servers

Suggestions
1

Enlisted has been going through a lot of updates and changes. Some of them were welcomed by most of the playerbase, while others faced mixed reactions. Few of the changes were not welcomed at all.

I think there must be more communication and feedback between the developers and the playerbase.
Once the update is released to the main servers, the developers might find it hard to change it after getting feedback(Idk about game server stuff, can anyone with knowledge explain?).
So what I am suggesting is a test server where everyone can experiece all weapons and equipment available in all campaigns. It doesn’t have to open 24/7, just opening it during the weekend is fine.
When developers want to make a change, they first update the test server with notifications on the forum. The test server will open at the following weekend, and players will give feedback based on their experience. Developers will take that feedback into consideration and prepare the main server update.

P.S. Some might say, ‘the game is in open beta phase, the servers are the test servers’.
There is a reason why I wrote the title Enlisted ‘will’ need test servers.

9 Likes
2

They tested the last update for 8 months in stalingrad before global release it

1 Like
3

nah, he is not talking about the current one.

but generally, we do need the test server.

for future stuff, so we can see and report things for fixes in time.

yesterday’s ( or two days ago update ) was actually good, but in the past, we had rushed updates.

hence, it would be good if we could test them before they go live and either tweak them, and/or send what’s not good inside ( or broken )

1 Like
4

Prepare to pay 60$ to get acces to test server and give feedback.

6 Likes
5

Im sure keofox said, dev keep using new campaign for test shit, so expect some ship in guadalcanal or halftracks in tunisia, but no test server like warthunder it seems they dont like it, the only similiar thing is the editor

6

it’s never late to change way of thinking, if the current one is “bad” ( or more like, questionably functional ) :slight_smile:

7

A lot of thing are questionable for a normal human, i suppose game developers are 100 parallel universe to us

3 Likes
8

stalingrad and this update is two separate thing

3 Likes
9

This update add thing tested in stalingrad for 8 months outiside the inertia, all thing was tested in stalingrad

10

Yes I really think we need one, both for Quality and Feedbacks. Now Devs just throw the update over, and just let it for like months doing nothing, either users like it or not.

They need to change up this, more efficient and better way.

2 Likes
11

what things ? in stalingrad we don’t have fg42 in stalingrad machine gunners needs stamina in stalingrad bolt actions was same as usual we dont have sten m3

1 Like
12

Think of what test servers can prevent. A second ‘grenade launcher’ disaster which lasted a week. How nice is that

2 Likes
13

Fg42 what? Have Visual recoil now, go look the thompson, dev tested BA buff,MG reocil,SMG recoil for 8 months in stalingrad, refuse to admit this is ipocrite, half of the update transfer stalingrad gameplay to the rest of the game

14

Is this CBT scam 2.0?

5 Likes
15

DARKFLOW: :fox_face: hey kid give me 50€ for a usless bike and 1 week of exclusive access

2 Likes
16

now half, you said all things : )

17

The other half is QOL fixes and visual recoil, you dint even read him right?, stopped at bolt-action buff and be offended?

18

ah man


what an adventure for this journey.

but i think @CaptainSebekel is more right,

" the road for the memes never truly ends "

( or somewhere near that, sorry for buthering that :x )

3 Likes
19

dont get crazy chill im playing mostly : ) and stalingrad and this update is two separate thing

1 Like
20

It seem you cant understand what you are playing