People with lower tier equipment e.g. mosin nagant or gwehr 43 should not be able to join BR5 games period.
People should not form up teams to join the same game to rig the match.
10 Likes
Agree, +/-0 MM would be awesome.
9 Likes
How will I be able to play with my friends if we can’t team up? That’ll ruin my experiences of the game…
2 Likes
br2 bolt action
br3 semis
br5 ARs
the in between BRs dont matter anyways, those 3 are played mostly anyways, might as well remove BR1 and BR4 and make everything ±0 BR
This, clans need their own match making system.
Agree, +1/-1 MM would be awesome there fixed it sorry but same tier is boring.
i wont math at you but anyone who wants more factions like UK Italy does not want 5 br q’s
I understand the argument but disagree.
For instance I like BR III Allies for the BARA2 and Thompson SMGs that actually work compared to the crappy BR I-II tech.
However I really dont like the M1 Garand and prefer to stick to the far more reliable and better sighted Lee Enfield Mk 4 rifle (BR II). The .303 is also more correct for British/Australian soldiers.
Likewise even at BR V, my squadmate likes to have at least one Springfield because he is a more long range player and prefers it for longer range shots to a Johnson for example. (he doesnt like the Garand either).
The Owen gun I have kept in my BR V lineup because its a bloody good gun for room clearing and other close quarter situations. It’s also Australian so patriotism as well.
Furthermore I agree with the argument that limits would prevent people from playing with friends. I remember when we moved from BR II to BR III and while I had mostly BR III weapons my squadmate remained with mostly BR II and he did surprisingly well.
The main issue for me is uptiers, especially BR III to BR V. As @Adamnpee said there should be no uptiers or downtiers.
We already have that for BR I, as it should be.
BR II should fight… BR II. BR V should fight BR V. Simple. It’s not that hard DarkFlow.
And be aware that in my experience Im already waiting 1 to 2 minutes for a match and still get stupid uptiers.
Id rather wait 3 minutes if I knew that I was guaranteed to be in an equal BR.
(Hell Let Loose takes like 15 minutes or more from opening the game to actually playing in a match because you have to wait for a free spot, or multiple free spots if youre with friends)
What I was saying was any player that had squad member that had bolt rifle or meme BR1 weapons such as storm pistol AT should not be able to participate BR5 or BR4 matches. Bolt vs Semi, I’m fine. Bolt vs full auto, not good. Way too much drag for the team.
Most people are playing solo, if you wanna rig matches then go play something else.
Yes, I’m rigging the system by bringing on my friends who only play the game when we do it together, those veterans with the collective gametime equal to the lifespan of a fruit-fly.
Glad to see the internet hasn’t lost its bad-faith takes.
1 Like
They can never stop me using my ‘‘Honorable’’ tactics
Playing on the same team, no big just fun with friends
Coordinating you’re efforts especially with outside chat you are not cheating but you are making the game worse.
My main pleasure in playing enlisted is to eliminate more BOTs. Maybe real players 5V5, half of BOTs are better choices, and more BOTs provide better battlefield atmosphere and shooting fun.
I don’t care so much about winning or losing. What’s more important is the process. I will be disappointed if enlisted becomes an e-sports game, because there are better works on the market.
(The translation may not be very accurate)