Enlisted vs Hell let Loose - comparison of US WW II weapons

HLL is very casual gameplay wise. But it is made for roleplayers.

3 Likes

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say. The Army used an M1903A4 with a Weaver scope; it was standard issue.

The Marine Corps used an M1903A1 with an Unertl scope but the Marines were in the Pacific, not in Europe.

There is no M1904 rifle. “Type 1904” is a scope designation. We don’t call a rifle with a type 1904 scope an “M1904”

The M1C was not used in any combat operations in WW2 (at least, it has never been confirmed. They show up in pictures but never in battle)

Again, I’m not exactly sure what you’re trying to say so I’m not sure whether I agree or disagree with you.
The Unertl mounts on the foreguard over the sights in front of the receiver but the USMC M1903 was not in A4 configuration, so again I’m not sure what you’re saying… The Weaver mounts across the magazine of an M1903 in A4 configuration.

I have an M1D, an M1918A1, an M1903, and an M1 Garand. Is there anything you would like to know about them? I obviously don’t know everything, but I might be able to answer your question.

that’s what i was implying. after all, there were no marines in western front outside seas operations ( such as guard british ships, values and stuff )

as for the game goes, it is a different rifle with different specs.

therefore, the one OP tried to make a comparison, is different.

the rifle used in HLL, it’s a m1904, the one used in the enlisted bit a M1903.

which have different sights too.

so much for a comparison between a carrot and a potato. isn’t it?

nope.

found all the answers i was looking for long time ago.

How do you know ? Both games say that this is a M1903 version (no M1904 in Enlisted and in HLL).

because scopes/rifles are different.

and the scope shown in HLL is also this one:

with the cross.

not the half mark.

image

you… didn’t noticed? nor have the A4 it self?

There is no M1904 rifle.

Alrighty.

yes there is:


in the game, modifications are actual a complete different gun, aka a new gun.

same goes for m3a1s, and m3 greese guns, gewehr 41 & gewehr 41 M etc.

despite being the “same”.

The M1903A4 is not known as the M1904

2 Likes

I did not notice. It is a dogshit game overall, so why bother with details :baby:

yes, in short term.

find me another item that has anything to do with the " M1904 " inside enlisted.

i’ll wait.

you’re supposed to do that.

what sort of comparison is it then? what’s the point?

There is no US rifle in Enlisted that is called the M1904

1 Like

ah you’re being a comedian.

got it.

No, I’m not. Are you trying to refer to the M1903A4?(original question that you didn’t confirm, but you kept saying “M1904” With as many back and forths that we have here, I’m fairly confident you are talking about the M1903A4, but hearing you call it by the wrong model is confusing and I don’t like operating on assumptions)

It’s called the “M1903A4” or the “Springfield A4” or the “Oh-three-ay-four” or if everyone already knows you’re talking about an M1903 Springfield rifle, the “A4”, but I have never heard anyone call it the “M1904.”

2 Likes

Maybe it could be useful to explain why it is improper to refer to the M1903A4 as the “M1904” rather than simply saying that is not correct.

It seems as if you’re trying to collapse the common “3A” about the A1, A3, and A4 M1903s so that you don’t have to repeat them, but this is incorrect and not in a “stickler for details” kind of way.

Prior to the 1930s, Army Ordnance used the year of issue as the model number.

The M1903 Springfield rifle was literally issued starting in 1903.
The M1905 Bayonet was literally designed in 1905.
The M1906 .30 caliber 150gr battle cartridge: 1906
The M1911 Colt .45 Auto Colt Pistol was literally issued starting in 1911.
The M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle was literally issued starting in 1918.

The M1904 was the Maxim machine gun.
M1904 was also used to designate the .30-04 battle cartridge.

But it was never used to designate the M1903A4

maxim2

2 Likes

Just throwing in info; neither game represents the M1903A4 sight picture perfectly, but if that HLL photo is trying to be the M1903A4, Enlisted does it much better.

The M1903A4 was issued with the Weaver 330 M73B1 scope. It has a reticle that looks exactly like this (not my photo)
4

HLL is nowhere near arcady/casual than CoD, BF or Enlisted, you guys water that shite way too down

I really wish we could have realistic mode in the future, we could have slower weapon handling, reloads, weapon malfunctions and everything that adds to immersion, those things obviously don’t fit in arcade style gameplay enlisted is right now and i totally understand that and I think there will be enough of an audience for separate game mode because slower handling and stuff can really create some epic moments and not just “I’ve just killed 18 enemies in a row yay”.

1 Like

Ah yes, the US army definitely big on not confusing things, like the highly distinct M1, or the M1, and the M1, and the other M1. Don’t forget the M1! But not the M1 though!

What’s the obsession with “muh realism”? Enlisted is unique and fun and almost the only selling point of the game is the arcadiness mixed with decent vehicles, fun gunplay and overall interesting premise. “Immersive” slogfests are dime a dozen at this point. Hell, you can go play Lonefighters and experience the “where’s waldo/crawling/walking sim” gameplay right in Enlisted engine to boot lol

You forgot the other M1