Enlisted is "build to win"

Mess Room
21

The best build when you are 100% f2p is:

  1. Anti-tank team + engineer + radio operator + sniper
  2. Light machine gun team + engineer + radio operator + sniper
  3. Assault team + engineer + radio operator + sniper
  4. vehicle as desired

Another option

  1. assault team + engineer + radio operator + sniper
  2. flamethrower team + engineer + radio operator + assaulter
  3. team of radio operators + engineer + sniper + grenadier
  4. vehicle as desired

An option for people who prefer bolt action and semi-automatic weapons

  1. Rifleman team + engineer + radio operator + assaulter
  2. Engineer team + stormtrooper + radio operator
  3. mortar team + engineer + engineer + sniper
  4. vehicle as desired

For a sniper team, it’s best to pick an engineer to be able to build ammo crates and rallypoints, and an assaulter for that. If you take a radio operator instead of an engineer, you will be able to carry out an artillery strike with precision.

If you like a typical sniper game, I recommend:

  1. team radio operators + sniper + engineer + assaulter
  2. team of snipers + radio operator + grenadier
  3. team of snipers + engineer + assaulter
  4. vehicle as desired
22

Oh, I didn’t say they weren’t good. Just the squad is straight forward and not terribly interesting :slight_smile: Can do what they do pretty well with a standard rifle.

now attaching a sniper to a Radio Squad is much more interesting.

23

I too havent really liked yhe trend of hand holding. I remember when games would just drop you in and you had to figure things out a bit yourself. But I guess its the ever busier lives of people these days.

3 Likes
24

I don’t think so.
Otherwise games like BG3, Elden ring etc. wouldn’t be so popular.
And it’s always funny how those stereotypical west Ubisoft-like devs are insecure everytime similar game release.
They’re trying as hard as they can to keep mainstream gameplay standard as low as possible.
The only priority is graphics, motion captures and overpriced nonsense like this.
And do you know why? Because they’re just dumping money on theirs friends this way.
Same goes with over priced crap like Rings of Power. They’re jsur getting richer by creating low quality shtt that’s presented as something AAA because it has good visual aspect.
Complete effortless moneytraps and nothing else.

Consumers would love to have complex games. They are popular.
But it would need more creative a actual effort to create such games.
It’s way easier to just milk 20 years old concept with less and less game per year.
“Devs” will still be paid for their work. Clueless invester will pay for it. So who actually cares?
They are primaly targeting braindead people. That’s why they hate any concept that’s too complex. They don’t want to target non-casuals gamers. It’s way easier to satisfy someone who don’t really give crap about your product.

EDIT: Sorry for my awful english.

3 Likes
25

It depends more on level and available guns.
And you also need to level up other squads to rank up soliders.

So soviets take 1-2 assaulter squads, germans with assaulter/mg mix depending which is better.
Radio operators are overrated in non-radio squad, cooldown to long and with how fast paced game is it’s better to die faster, take more at/engineers, even medics.

Flamethrowers are op if used right, like tunisia has to big maps and only lvl 1 squad with lower range, but in Berlin they are king.

What sucks is no option to take squads to level up and competitive ones at the same time.
So best could be like 3 assaulter squads for soviets as they are most universal, mortar/flame/radio depends too much on map. Same with vehicles, open maps are great for plane’s rockets, but suddenly city map and pain

26

This very hard.

And the saddest thing is that people are idiots and fall for that.
Games are played for gameplay and mechanics. If you want graphics go see a movie.

3 Likes
27

I have a big bet that this game has a bunch of underage kids playing it that are the reason matches are so unbalanced. since little kids don’t have a brain. I think the large majority of casual players that aren’t effective in Enlisted are immature, Also my claims are not totally false conclusions since more and more parents don’t stop their kids from playing these games and ruining a perfectly good game for adults. that’s how Fortnite got ruined, Fortnite was a stupid concept from the beginning period. the same way the rec room got ruined.

1 Like
28

You’d be surprised, but lot of console players are 30+/40+ old guys just chilling around and not understanding a single thing they did in the game.

On other hand, kids can adapt very quickly. I don’t think majority of underage players are braindead. I do remember my gaming years as a kid.
Enlisted is very casual friendly game. It’s F2P and it’s on consoles.
But I really don’t think that’s bad thing. The bad thing is you are beinging punished only for getting less skilfull team.
I speak only for yourself. But I wouldn’t mind losing one-sided matches.
But since there’s so big noticeable reward differce between losing/winning team. It’s seems like waste of time to me to play with bad teams. I am not rewarded properly for my effort. While others being rewarded for playing popular factions, only farming bots & casuals. It’s very frustrating.

4 Likes
29

This might explain my teams.
Old people who saw a ww2 game for free and took it.

1 Like
30

Since you don’t want or can’t invest in additional slots, relying only on assault units leads to a pathology where such players leave the game as soon as they see that there is a large open space on the map.

For this reason, it is the best set of troops for f2p players as it allows you to flexibly adapt to the conditions of changes on the battlefield.

31

MY guess is enlisted probably appeals most to 30-40 bracket who were brought up on the ww 2 genre and looking for nostaligia.

I know the gamer students at my work arent familiar with enlisted.

But i do love schooling the little whipper snappers :slight_smile:

32

Ok boomer

2 Likes
33

I think it doesn’t really matter. Pretty much anyone can be interested in games like this.
I was always interested in WWII, watching all kind of documentary series about it when I was 13 yo. I am currently 22.

But it’s obvious mainstream is somewhere else nowadays. ±15 yeas back, enlisted would way more popular.

34

Haha yup, thats how they talk, allllll the way back to the respawn screen :stuck_out_tongue:

1 Like
35

In 2008 this game would have been the best (especially with the graphics it has now).

36

You should go talk to @83312939.
Dudes like 60 years old.

37

Doesnt suprise me, my mates dad (who got us into gaming in the first place) is still smashing it in his 60s lol

2 Likes
38

Keyboards?
Its cool to see the older generation having fun with the new “whippersnappers”.

1 Like
39

Theres some “mild” swearing involved
and the odd keyboard :slight_smile:

2 Likes
40

Having been around old men a lot (my father was a sailor, and as the saying goes, “swear like a sailor”) swearing was often involved. (sometimes at me).

1 Like