Thats fine, Im just pushing the base idea, which is as you say. Thanks for your support
1 Like
I also want to point out that this is its own idea. Its not about wanting to buff CAS even more.
I am still in favour (and have been for a long time) of changing How CAS interacts with everyone via, Airfields, Pushed back spawns, lockouts, slowing down the rearm/bomb cycle… etc etc
2 Likes
Agreed. Customizable loadout is sensible, useful and fun. It doesn’t have to mean vehicles are inherently stronger than they currently are against infantry. It just provides options.
1 Like
This would be great addition as we would be able to see more varied aircraft in lower brs since planes like p 47 and f4u corsair could be in lower brs with less rockets. Also players who are still using low br vehicles in high br could atleast have a bit more fighting chance
1 Like
Exactly 
We get alot more mileage out of our vehicles/aircraft by seperating the vehicle/aircraft power, from the ordnance power.
Developers are literally having trouble balancing vehicles with fixed loadouts. This would just unleash total chaos and an incredible balancing problem.
Infantry players would then start complaining even more about vehicles, which would lead to them being limited (which would result in me totally losing interest in this game).
Dynamic BRs is nice idea. But it’s very naive.
I dont agree…its no different than adding a New plane with a fixed loadout and having to decide where it goes (which they are doing anyway)…They mostly decide based on payload anyway…they decided 4x German rockets was too much at BR 3. They decided 6x250KG bombs at BR 4 was too much…they are making these decisions based on the ordnance more than the plane. Then if you have those boundaries, its not hard to assign what ordnance package goes where, While freeing up the plane/tank to start at a lower BR with lesser/no ordnance.
This way you dont punish the Aircraft, for the payload it has access to, OR the Tank for the Ammunition it has access to…
In anycase…custom loadouts will come in some form…if they continue developing… Im sure of it…I can smell it
1 Like
Yes, but not to that extent.
This would more or less almost triple the number of vehicles to be balanced. That’s just the way it is.
And I bet it would be extremely chaotic. Doesn’t really matter if we are speaking about triple the number of seperate unique vehicle with fixed loadouts or the thing you just proposed.
Warthunder does it a few vehicles at a time. Adding payloads to one existing plane at a time in Enlisted is worth more than adding half a dozen entirely new aircraft. This is a GOLD mine of new content.
How exactly? New vehicles means new things to grind. Payloads effectively means nothing. Players won’t have to spend any further resources on them, they would upgrade vehicles either way.
and yet you see the same favourites every game because of their payload…IARC, p40, P-38, BF110, P-47 ,…Those are OLD planes…they have been around a long time
Why dont you see anyone using stuff like the BF 109F?..that would change pretty quickly if you could add a 250kg bomb or gunpods to you BF109 F.
The majority pick payload…payload = fun. People tend to hate something when they spend time grinding for it, to find out its a piece of shit…
There are event CAS that players grinded…but unless they have the right payload…people dont use them (whens the last time you saw the P-47 with M8 rockets?)
The New event plane we are doing now, I guarantee would collect dust if it didnt have the bombs aswell)
1 Like
That’s not what I meant, I’m not talking about the players’ perspective.
Ok rewind…keep it simple…do you want to choose the ammo belt in your 262 narwhal or have it chosen for you?
Its a good thing
2 Likes
Well, this wouldn’t change BR of the plane in any way. My concerns were mainly about dynamic BRs loadouts.
1 Like
well, from the look of the leask by the CM him self on accident, it looks like something is coming.
with that being said,
my cynical part of me cannot wait for some sort of bug with presets that will mess up and place higher br shells/bombs in lower matches / vehicles.
but i could be wrong.
anyway, this system would make somewhat viable other vehicles in higher br.
i wouldn’t mind roaming with pumas with the better shell,
or getting the m24 it’s rightfull shells 
.
6 Likes
It seems to be a very complex and extensive mechanism, so it might be difficult.
no more complicated than Equipping your soldiers with gear 
1 Like
What did they leak? haha I need to know, also, yes, M24 NEEDS M61 APCBC
1 Like
3 Likes
Interesting…i hadnt seen that one. I assumed you were talking about the slipped comment in regards to 262 narwhal ammo belts.
There you go
1 Like