Yeah, with the Allies you could add a British, Canadian, French and Australian units and Italians to the Axis, as well as adding a dozen new maps with totally new battles, including USSR vs Japan. Despite making the game more competitive, these kind of things will keep the game feeling new and might bring in and retain more players.
1 Like
Agree with all of the above.
I wish people would understand as you say that adding new content like this encourages new players to the game and retention of existing ones. If we just keep getting generic American and Soviet maps and squads over and over people will lose interest.
Thereās so much that happened in WWII I cannot comprehend why games are so adamant at ignoring like 95% of it (if Hollywood and games were true than WWII was just Omaha Beach, Stalingrad, Berlin and Iwo Jima).
2 Likes
Agreed, I do think thereās a lot of historically accurate stuff that would be very interesting to see. Like the pacific could be expanded with the Malayan campaign and inland fighting in New Guinea, Manchuria, and in Europe the whole early war is missing lol.
1 Like
To be perfectly honest, I have no idea why they didnāt have Iwo Jima already in the game as it was one of the most iconic battles of WW2. Lots of Pacific, European and even more African maps they could include.
3 Likes