If German guns dealt 15 and Mosins 16 I would argue that the increased damage didn’t matter enough for the fire rate to be lower, but this slight damage barrier which means the difference between one and two shotting is imo weighing down the game significantly
1 Like
Considering the last match I spent a good minute or so having to two tap people with the Dragoon, I’d say the difference is minimal. Could even make the reach to say the k98 is better at two tapping thanks to the quicker bolt)))
Playing both sides, the difference isn’t readily noticable for me at all, sorry. Not saying that I don’t get where you’re coming from and the concerns with it though, so if I sent that message I apologize.
1 Like
Also Ka98, vz.24 and g33 have much better aim then m1985, Dragoon and 1907 carabine which make it a lot more deadly guns
1 Like
Why do you keep going on about the sights? Kar and g33 have slightly better sights (which are subjective) so that means it should have less damage?
I haven’t seen a single person make that argument.
The most successful sniper in the world used a modified version of the M1907, with the sight being retargeted to meters, and a free floating barrel. No other modifications.
So sights is 100% subjective
But Ka98, vz.24 and g33 also looks “good and cool” so it should also do less damage …
Coz all russian mains defend thier obvious more damaging rifles by that only lol you should say since russia looses all matches thier guns should do more damage so that they can atleast try to win
What are you talking about? Red army soldiers in 1920-30 asks to upgrade this scope to a normal. Thats why m1938 was made. Its even a historical fact. LMAO Btw any player could approve my words.
What are you talking about, dude?
The Finnish variant was based on the 1907, at least as far as I am aware.
All the defects of the system of the Dragoon rifle of the 1891-1910 model are also present in the carbine. In general, the Russian carbine in its structure and ballistic properties turned out to be worse than the foreign carbines that were then in service. All this was confirmed in the war of 1914-1918. German, Turkish, and Japanese carbines of the new type were found to be more advanced than the Russian carbine.
In terms of accuracy of combat, the carbine gives a dispersion of one and a half times more than an infantry rifle.
It have slow rate of fire and a shittiest aim in whole game.
did you guys ever agree on anything?
All the defects bla bla I never said anything about that.
I only ever said that the sniper with the most kills in WW2 used a modified variant of it, which only had the range markers changed on the sights when compared to the model of 1907. (as well as a free-floating barrel, but in terms of sights that’s it)
Mostly killing weapon now accoding to a police report is a kitchen knife. Is this a proof we have to use knife in a game?
All I am saying is that your rant about the sights being worse is without fact, while a fact is that that sight was used to obtain the highest ammount of confirmed kills by any sniper so it can not be all bad.
Comparing to a slow rate of fire which is a fact you just arguing for no reason. Any player who play with carbine 1907 say you the same. Maybe if you try it once you will agree but I doubt. You play only one side. Try to take it from a dead body at least.
The slower rate of fire and damage comparisons are seperate from my reply about you and your sights.
I have taken many mosins from dead bodies.
I dont have any issues with aiming them.
With the later models I actually prefer them because of the aforementioned more consistent oneshots.
Oh really? Looks you aint use it couse Mosin 1907 doesnt get one shot premiums.
just headshot them if i can why cant you?
1 Like