do i know it?? 
Soooooo good
- I play it modded, MACE, Valor, CE 2…thats why no acheivements lol
1 Like
have you dabbled in the excellent mods? Ive done Dynamic campaigns as Italians, Hungarians, French, Brits, Yanks
Hotmod and Valor are the mandatory ones, I liked the first person view when it was still updated.
Other than that the one who changes the atmosphere of the game to have a bit more colors is pleasant to my eyes.
1 Like
Keep playing only one side surely isnt helpfull for that.
I would like to know those evil propagandas where they claim the Panzer III is a monster because otherwise I’m pretty sure the myth of the StG, Tiger and Panther (and MG42) made people believe that Moscow Axis, a campaign where neither of the stuffs existed historical-wise and game-wise, is supposed to be ez game for Axis.
Riiight.
Ehm Wow, so it’s still wrong to ask for HEAT and StuGs?
And if it is a game, why is it whining to mention the fact that almost all campaigns are heavily one-sided in terms of player numbers and is mostly based on the levels, regardless of factions?
Nah. Just propagandized in other more concenring ways but whatever.
It still doesn’t change the fact that one side has it notable easier to kill the other side to the point that one side needs to aim for small weak spots and the other side can aim at the entire front with almost all of their tanks.
I would say those claims have more hand than “evil propaganda of stuff from 1942+ made people believe campaigns set in 1941-42 are also OP” and “PPSh does 0.2-4 dmg less, so it’s fine”.
Well. Keep playing Tunisia Allies with end gear surely wont make progress in (insert any other faction) faster I guess.
Please be less specific.
Shit talking about Axis gear while not even playing one of them in the recent time (or not even their entire arsenal) is surely a good way to brag around with experience I guess.
I dont know why a bunch of nicknames is now liked to this entire discussion.
Because its edgy, funny and people like you react in a way that makes it even funnier.
(But communist nicknames and communist purges and praising Stalin are fine I guess)
This derail is really next level, even ofr me. Surely this conspiracy bullshit is more logical than DF simply being unable to make decent campapigns regardless of side…
Which are all tankies… or my favorite… China-Pleb-Clown, who literally admitted that he finds purges necessary and still shares links to communist websites in his profile. But no. Let’s talk about edgy nicknames and my edgy home nation joke because that is true Nazi…
Then simply don’t reply to me if you see it as waste of time or do it the NKVD dude and mute me after your latest essay of how the War in Ukraine connects to the fact that people don’t like playing Moscow Axis because they expected to play a Panther in Winter 1941.
Well. Shittaling about stuff you actually own would help a bit I guess.
Well. I made the bold claim that DF simply struggles to make balanced campaigns outside (Current) Normandy and Pacific, and that is backed by robhirs dats shown that most campaigns have a clear shift towards one side, either Axis or Allies. The Allies are simply a bit more oppressive in terms of number of campaigns. It ain’t rocket science. If 2 campaigns have notable more Allied plays while 1 campaign has notable more Axis players (and in both cases therefore better winrates), then Heil Himmler, greet Walter Ulbricht and praise Joseph Stalin, you will most likely get more threads about Allied campaigns than about Berlin (or the OP Panzer IV F2).
But…
No. Let’s make up some conspiracy bullshit that even wastedwoodman wouldn’t have come up with because it’s way harder to prove… and makes it therefore more logical, I guess?
1 Like
And the individual just confirmed everything I said… so yeah, you were talking about equivalencies…
1 Like
Sorry, didn’t follow much after I’ve wrote “anyway”. I like the intellectual debate like any other man, but only when there’s a slight “openness” to other’s points.
To sum down grossly, I said there’s exclusive mains in all factions, and all of those are prone to whine against the faction opposing them. The difference between us is I don’t pick sides. I despise all exclusive who whine against the faction they don’t play equally. Heck. I possibly hate wherabooboos as much as you do.
You answered (again, really summarized) by something along the lines of “no, only wherabooboos are whiners, and I am not. you’re trying to find equivalencies, no you!”
The funny thing you probably never realized, is that I always was more Soviet centered, than axis centered… where do you think “conscript” comes from 
Anyway (for the last time) you’re free to keep your disillusions, but as the old saying goes:
“It takes 2 sides to argue” there’s wherabooboos and… 
Nice day to all
5 Likes
I’ve maxed Moscow Soviets first and I loved it for the snow and rural environment plus team Ballance.
But then I tried Normandy axis and it became my new favourite because axis equipment was so good. Also players felt smarter than other factions.
Then I took Stalingrad allies and loved it for the urban warfare so I maxed it too.
Few good players but it was my fav for a while.
Tried both sides of Pacific but I have to say it’s my least favourite at the moment.
Then Tunisia allies which was my least favourite for most it time became my favourite and will be even more once common wealth countries get their own faction.
I think it’s relevant to mention that the even if Pacific axis didn’t find a way to my heart, the players did and I’ve never seen so many active and intelligent engeneer game play as I’ve seen on this faction.
It has less stopping power than PPSh, why the hell it should even have 0.1 more, lol. Only because nazi fanboys would whine again and again and again. They forget to whine about them using MG34 and MG42 with rifle damage rounds as SMGs (on par with non-existant STG and hungarian spraying nonsense) though.
I’m sure you were flying not engine forced La-5 with Shvaks like we have in Enlisted against FW-190 with 6 cannons that spawned in air in CBT to come to this conclusion.
well actually both, t-50 & fedorov were produced in by far smaller quantitys than so called wunderwaffe guns.
Actually it was “stored” aka retired from service long before operation barbarossa.
The urgent need of automatic weapons was the only reason it was drawn to service during winterwar.
And yes it makes sense to discard a weapon system you dont have ammunition for.
As said before it 7.62x25 actually does less damage than 9mm IRL. Terminal ballistics.
But dont let such annoying facts to alter your believes of muzzle energy related damage.
No idea what you are upset about here. You think LMGs functions like smg or ?
Oh they did in past, but it was too much to handle for soviets so they were heavily nerfed.
2 Likes
Nope. Just Picking T-126, t-50, t-34 or KV-1 and pressing W…Faceroll. Good old Stalinium.
Then back in the day there was the Yak 9T UFO/sniper , soo much fun, but sooo dirty.
Arent as Trolly these days, but the early days ruined it for me. But then you have the IS -6 and object 279, Ka-50, 2S38 etc etc for all your current faceroll needs.
2 Likes
Oh man, axis player complaining about their paras SMG not being good enough when they will have flamethrowers, moscow allies op post and the post about Berlin Allies and Moscow axis not being so black and white and they are still possible to compete was quickly flooded with germany mains saying that moscow axis is in a worse spot than berlin allies and it was just a week.
Anything i lost about allied mains complaining?
Damn. Those Crypto-Nazis are everyhwere.
(Btw. One topic wants to nerf Jap AT rifle and another “TeChNiCaLlY” complains about the M10 and M18)