Dicker Max Topic

Suggestions
26

That’s because the IJA was never given attention and the IJN got all the budget

27

parrot the ally dont need a full team they only need 4 player to annihilate JP team (at least from my experience that is)

1 Like
28

Japan has no BR V viable weapons in WWII

29

Even their navy would be II at best

30

I don’t even want to read it, but I understand that someone doesn’t understand that Dicker Max has a powerful gun and that’s why it can’t be lower than BR3. The fact that it has an open hull is the specificity of this design. If someone buys a premium vehicle in a game where premium units do not give an advantage and thinks that they can drive it among enemy infantry, congratulations on their IQ.

1 Like
31

That is true but if you actually have a team you could infinitely farm the defenders and get a stupid amount of points

1 Like
32

Japan was cursed by design and they still are

1 Like
33

The only success the Japanese ever had were surprise attacks. After that, everywhere we went we stomped their faces in so hard they became pacifists post war. They can handle III-IV Allies and II USSR at best

34

This is true the jap are so full of themselve during ww2 it amazing that they think the US are weak. Beside the jap think that they are invincible or something during ww2 which is very dumb.

1 Like
35

You’re being too optimistic for Japan and they were screwed from the start

1 Like
36

right when the BRs got introduced I posted basically this:

TDs and SPGs are over tiered, this should fix them:

Stug III A - HEAT switched with HE, then put into BR1 because no turret or MG and same 50mm armor as BR 1 tanks

Stug III F - same armor as BR1 tanks, but BR3 gun, no MG, no turret → should go into BR2

SU 76 - no armor, open top, no mg, T34 gun → should go into BR2

M10 - more or less same armor as Sherman, open top, exposed MG → should be BR3

M18 - no armor at all, open top, overall a M10 with better gun but worse armor → should be BR3

SU 85 M - should be removed and replaced with a regular SU 85 ( 45mm armor) → BR3

Jagdpanzer IV L70 - bit better armor than Panther, same gun, → BR4

SU 100 - great gun, no MG no turret → BR4

4 Likes
37

yea that is also true tbh

1 Like
38

This sounds significantly better than our current layout

1 Like
39

yea i really want to use the M10 but since it open top it kinda “unappealing” if that make sense (but now i use Achilles since i need it for anti Tiger 2 job)(oh and no i cant use plane since someone always hog it 24/7 so Achilles or in future firefly and M26 it is)

1 Like
40

“Superior warrior spirit” when it meets logistics, manufacturing, 30-06, and the Imperial measurement system (16” shells)

1 Like
41

I also argued that the Dicker max should be a BR3 vehicles - guess the devs had the same idea.

42

With your suggested layout it is…slightly less egregious. I’m still suicide bombing every single one I see out of sheer, unadulterated spite and hatred

43

Still waiting for DF to let us choose our plane loadouts.

1 Like
44

Unfortunately, your post has just come off as biased towards a tank that is not your preferred nation to play. The tank itself which I own is not that strong when pressured by infantry who can throw any hand grenade or molotov near the top killing most if not all crew members, bombs have a very far kill radius for this tank being an open top and side armor being thin. It has no mg or abilities to commander peak with sidearm, leaving you open to easy deaths.

2 Likes
45

Good. I hate that tank with every fiber of my being and want it gone