you guys always listen carefuly community’s idea and very often to apply to game from start.
but too many cooks spoil the broth
in most users in communities(reddit, forum, ect) are biased towards there’s own inclinations(like economic or fan of some faction), it means that loud voice isn’t always right
so I hope you push your goals first without interference, community’s idea or opinion must be insurance for when you guy’s direct gonna wrong,
you can realize by data(number of users or revenue)when if game gonna wrong
31 Likes
Im confused. Which side, which topic?
everything from start
like change payment system , make cuisine royale to stand alone, balance of semi automatic , change of stalingrad before release
1 Like
But this idea is not suitable for Stalingrad, when a new campaign is release, there will be many people joining it, if the campaign fail to keep player, it will be dead. Many people were unhappy with Stalingrad, so dev must change something. If they wait until the campaign release, it will be too late because many people already left the campaign .
1 Like
if this refers to p2w thats gayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy. And definitely dont accept with it.
P2P entirely fine.
No idea.
I dont recall anyone asking for this so in this sense devs following theyr own opinions isnt exactly right way.
go full p2p and im fine with it or separate lobbys f2p / p2p
Well that seems to be true. Same for the game balance problems and some new features, Devs need to be more decisive and push it foward.
Devs now are a bit swayed around by some voices from reddit, forum and etc. But those Voices always can’t be true, sometimes they may be wrong or biased. I hope them to be more determined.
1 Like
Then we have another Tunisia so what?
Some people that buy the pack will be piss off because they buy a campaign that is full of bots.
You can see to future that you said that? Got any evidence? Or is it just that you wont be playing that campaign, soo in your eyes no one will?
13 Likes
You see my badges?
Guess how the CBTs were?
Reddit didnt give a fuck about them though
9 Likes
So how is the CBT related to Stalingrad?
Well the most problem isnt about balance, or is it P2W or not. The problem is that they sold the stalingrad as 30$ pack with the list :
One friend i know bought the entire 30$ pack for the PPsh. and now Devs have changed PPsh to be free, and He even cant get a refund. Now this is the problem, Devs being swayed around with the damn whole pack with bunch of Component could make the problem with those Early buyers, who are mostly loyal to the game.
3 Likes
Stalingrad without content. So why isnt Stalingrad going to work it actually has content and is far cheaper than Cbts?
Guess reddits just dont want to pay anything.
Many people are not happy about that, not just me.
If you use this kind of word, I can also ask do you have any evidence this campaign will have enough player? Can you see the future?
CBT have Stalingrad?
We can’t see the future, but at least we can predict it based on Former Tests. Berlin CBT, Normandy CBT and Moscow CAT. need any more?
No…
CBTs are similiar to Stalingrad except Stalingrad is cheaper and has content.
And many people are.
No i dont, but i dont write something like :
When you can’t know how will it look.
Tunisia CBT is very dead, and it is the most recent one.
Tunisia is not CBT. When it had CBT, it was like for a week and then it was open, it was much worse than what we have now.
And Tunisia now is pretty much okay campaign, lot of people are playing it, have you tried for yourself or is your info only from reddit whiners?
10 Likes