Desert penalty prediction

Mess Room
1

Hello to all :parrot: :parrot: today we are trying to predict the possible addition of the “desert penalty” (i’m talking about how it Will be implemented)

So lets beggin:

1-removal of desert button

Yes tecnically the best way to kill all deserters and even if you alt f4 and you rejoin you will appear on the same game until it finish

2- Xp penalty

by using the deserting option you will get lets say… -20% xp gain for the next game and it will be acumulating if you keep deserting until you reach 100% then the number of games without getting xp will increase (and there is no timer for the booster and if you want to remove it you will be forced to play games normally) but i think this will be useless against players who have alr completed the TT so we could make this even more rude.

3- suspension

Like cs2/valorant system if you leave a game a timer of 30 minutes will block you to start any other game and it will be increasing to 1 hour 2 hour 4… until lets say 10 Years XDDD or well just banning your account instantly

4-Suffering

I dont have any other idea to call this lets say tha if you leave a game and then go to another one instantly the mm will send you to a literal hell (bot and useless team, no rallies no communcation, toxicity beetween players while enemy got decent or 4 stacked team) reminding you that leaving will no change nothing

any other idea? share it below : ) or we could just disccuss thee ones i mentioned

see ya nerds :parrot: : )

2 Likes
2

Under the premise of being able to choose a map, the punishment of reduced profits is acceptable for escape behavior. The other punishment methods are too harsh. Please, there are not many players in this game, and driving them away is not beneficial to the game

8 Likes
3

we already have the penalty when deserting join any team to remove the boost for one match and that enough

1 Like
4

as i mentioned this are just suppositions and yea i think i`ve just let my imagination run to much XD

5

Suspension would just make more player don’t play the game

2 Likes
6

we still having lots of deserters on this game and i think that the penalty should be extended to nomal games penalizing the xp gain if you desert

2 Likes
7

and that would encourage them to play the game how? If they got into a one side match they still wouldnt stay in the match even if you lock their whole army for desert

1 Like
8

By the way, it’s hard to imagine an online battle game that has been in operation for many years, where players can’t check their match records within the game

9

idk df could aslo add rewards for ppl who dont desert like increasing the ammount of silver gain or giving free xp just little thinking but even if is just an idea it could be very useful to make players stay.

btw one sided games are another problem on this game due the lack of ppl with a working brain but lets say that if game lasts less than 10 minutes the lossing team could get like a little compesation of 2-3k of silver so even if you losse you will get at least a couple of some which may help to keep players

2 Likes
10

well thats is basically DF being lazy over all these years…

(still wondering why the dont send the graphic deparment guys to the bugs and game mechanics department)

11

The crux of the problem is that there aren’t enough new players joining. As a result, we always struggle to find enough people for a match. It makes no sense to come up with all sorts of strange rules to repeatedly torment these few thousand veteran players. The influx of more new players can solve most of the problems.

1 Like
13

This is also why I’ve been suggesting the addition of a Chinese faction. I’m aware that its tech tree might not be entirely reasonable.

14

yes good point… i mean instead of giving penalties we could encorage players by giving them rewards even if lossing a game lets take my statement as an idea

15

The current silver coin earnings are indeed not high enough. It’s a good idea to offer more rewards to those who perform outstandingly on the losing side.

2 Likes
16

yee at least the prices are not as bad as in the beggining of the merge but gain still to low and it must be increased to have better economy

1 Like
17

No, the main issues are that (good/ seasoned) players tend to migrate between factions, especially during new content updates, making certain factions and BRs unplayable during these phases.

Not enough players? Just add another faction to the MM to split the playerbase even further.
Genius move.

18

Games that ban you for leaving by not playing the game are stupid and just shoot in their own foot.

1 Like
19

Add new faction will also attracting new players
It would be a double-edged sword, no one can predict the future

I never understand the statement that says game doesn’t have enough player, since the merge we gets full 10 vs 10 90% the time

1 Like
20

depends on the game i mean who would like to end with 1 player less? in a game where team coordination is the key of winning and plus is a ranked game? so tecnically the best way to avoid this is to put a penaltly to those kind of players

and we have to consider if you are going to play you will stay in the match and dont leave it before it ends

but again this is a casual game so a penalty like the one i mentioned is quite bad idea tbh

1 Like
21

For a game that has only a few thousand concurrent players all year round, without any changes, the number of so - called excellent players won’t increase. Do you really expect so - called novices to grow? Adding a Chinese faction or some other new factions can attract new players. Maybe you think there will never be new blood joining.