Some players complain that some planes (mainly fighter jets) lack bombs, forcing them to use low BR fighter jets such as P40E1 in high BR scenarios;
Some players complain that some planes are too OP or too useless (in their current BR), such as the Me410 B-1 having no advantage over the JU188, as well as A20 vs IL2M-3;
Some of the ammunition in the tank is useless, for example, when I drive an IS2, I won’t need so much APHE, and tanks with HEAT ammunition don’t need so many HE shells, etc
The above issues can be easily solved: providing optional ammunition/explosives for aircraft/vehicles.
We can upgrade the number of bombs for the aircraft at a cost of +1 or +2BR, and vice versa. The ready-made formula of WT is waiting for DF;
We can choose the type and quantity of ammunition for the tank independently, so that I can reduce the risk of being blown up by reducing ammunition, or reduce useless types of ammunition (and replace them with other types), which will be more conducive to the player’s choice;
Or introduce more types of ammunition such as APCR? Perhaps you can choose them and moderately increase BR.
5 Likes
This would be good if we could have armor piercing rockets or the Jack of all trade rockets like the Americans or bring more smoke shells to cover your teammates.
1 Like
it was even hinted as a feature for " nearest future " 2 years ago in a Q&A:
so… where is that?
you’re telling me that in 2 years this is impossible to do?
when it can be done through mods in perhaps, a week for all vehicles?
funny…
but i sure would love to being able to take out IS2s and stronger tanks with better shells for my puma lol.
or actually give better shells to m24s and m10s…
4 Likes
That answer from two years ago… It really reminds me of how Microsoft engineers claimed that Win10 would be the last Windows OS. Netizens have a bad memory, it’s always like this, sigh.
2 Likes
i’m inclined to believe that people forget things for convenience. ( at least, in enlisted case. as it goes for microsoft, i can bet my whole body it’s just " good business" as it goes for the marketing reasons… )
or… they legit had runned into so many troubles that they couldn’t deal with them / fix them, so they had to abandon or postpone the idea and work behind.
either one of those two, or something else.
not much is known on what happens inside those offices anyway.
1 Like
Of course, I’m used to it, it’s like this everywhere.
They are very clear that explaining the reason will not have any benefits, other than evoking memories and eliciting condemnation from netizens, for them.
Even if we remember that answer, what’s the use of it?
The voters cannot decide anything, the vote counters determine everything.