Covering tanks in foilage is very historically acuate, could balance it by making the crew get out of the tank to apply the camo.
War Thunder shows that bushes are a mistake for tanks full stop.
Would be doubly so here since thereās no ULQ to make them stand out.
3 Likes
It is, but I can already imagine how much damage would do those disguised tanks on the back of D day landing or forest/bushes etc.
I donĀ“t think it is a good idea to have this kind of disguise in the game, and definitely not monetized.
2 Likes
I donāt know, I think it would only help for ambush, after the tank has fired its toast. I think tanks are weak in the game as is. I destroy them quick with TNT.
Have you played WT?
Do you know what Iām talking about at all?
Bushes on tanks are unironic 100% p2w.
3 Likes
They can still be marked as now. I donāt play WT, but those battles take place at far greater ranges then Enlisted. Almost every tank I kill as infantry in Enlisted I find by the engine noise.
Then you have no clue where Iām coming from and what Iām talking about.
They seem like a good idea, but they arenāt.
1 Like
The bushes work better the farther you are away. They still work really well when spammed on tanks even point blank. ULQ helps reign it in by removing all other foliage that it blends into. Enlisted has no such ULQ bush disable, so it would be a pay to win, camping nightmare to have bushes.
2 Likes
And to add to that. Enlisted should NEVER get ULQ.
If it does? Immediate fatwa
2 Likes
I played PUBG, Deadbydaylight and etc. Most of paid skins areā¦ pay to lose. They are so colorful and conspicuous.
Also I want them to add rank symbol especially for the soviet, the NKVDās uniform is definitely an officer.
Whereās my fucking stg 44 waifu skin for my stg 44?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
2 Likes
Yeah they have some of those skins in BFV like bright pink, chrome, ect, plane skins.
Thats because most people in tanks have no idea how to play them. A good tank player can sit at range with infantry support and get a hundred kills in a match without dying while defending a point the whole time.
Iām playing on Console, like I said I came from BFV and those camo schemes are not very effective in that game, cause they only render when you are close. So in a plane a foilage covered tank looks like a basic tank shape.
Those are not camos, those are cosmetics that (badly) pretend to be camos.
On top of being horribly historically inaccurate.
Good luck differentiating between a hay stack and this at 500m:
or this:
3 Likes
Well BFV isnāt anything like Enlisted or WT. I donāt want you to go play WT, so please take my word for it.
Bushing up a tank in WT is not comparable to putting a single branch on a tank like in BFV.
1 Like
I was playing Americans on the beach invasion map couple nights ago, there was a guy up on ridge in a panzer 4 just covering the objective. He was murdering everyone, so I built a Pak on the beach and killed him. Iām the type of player that when I see a tank, I make it my mission to destroy them.
Yeah and you most likely wouldnāt find him nearly as easily if he had actual historical camo and was properly hull down.
1 Like
BFV was an a historical mess, I wonāt defend their stupid skins, or Japanese soldiers running around in Arras, and Rotterdam.
1 Like