Cosmetic monetization

Well the stream of tracers coming out of his MGs made him hard to miss.

And I do not support the historical mess behind having to pay to put camo on your tank.

Imagine walking to the resupply depot to get some paint to prepare your tank for an ambush and the sergeant in charge of inventory says “that would be 25$, please.”

That’s on him.

2 Likes

Id consider it a bit of a fail for him to just let you build an AT gun on an open beach for 15 seconds in front of him unless he was engaging another unit. Also, a good tanker wont expose himself to the entire landing force by sitting in the open on a ridge

1 Like

Im not saying its a guarantee you wont die, but being able to wipe multiple squads and hold a point down for 5 to 10 minutes is not, as you called it, “weak”.

He was beside a little stone building on the right side of the gorge, he was focused on the second capture point, he backed up behind the building, so I had to destroy my Pak and move it to finish him off.

Talking about one horribly detailed situation to try to prove your point does not help lol.

We got like 10+ people here saying big NOPE to paint on vehicles or uniforms to be paid only as a core concept. They have to be free. Accept it and move along.

1 Like

The main guns are next to useless against infantry, I don’t know if HE shells are bugged or just bad, but I can put a tank shell into the wall next to a squad and get zero splash damage, you have to use it like a big rifle and shoot them head on with it to kill them.

But I see your point, they are still powerful as a mobile tough MG nest.

I don’t care if they are paid or not, I was just saying that I would buy camo skins, not for an advantage, but because I think they look cool.

I would have rather paid 60$ and got the 4 campaigns, and buy new campaigns as DLC, but that’s not happening, I want the game to succeed. So we can get new campaign/maps/vehicles in the future.

Uh… You just said it was historically inaccurate, then posted proof that it is indeed historically accurate.

I think you are just a contrarian, who wants to argue.

I was talking about the BFV stuff, as you could see by the reply symbol redirecting you to this:

Yes

This is not BFV

Never said it was, I like WW2.

There was no alternative to BFV on console, until Enlisted.