The so-called Type 5 Ho-Ri, which will go into Japan’s general progression tree:
All that is known about this vehicle is a wooden mockup:
That is, not even a single test unit has been built, it is impossible to know if such a design would work at all, if it could fire, if it could propell itself.
Also, as far as we can tell from this thread from the WT forum, the drawings and data for this vehicle were fabricated by some user:
According to this logic, if we find a picture of any wooden mockup, without any evidence of not only serial production, not only deliveries to the troops, not only use in WWII, but even the presence of a working unit, we will tick the box and happily add it to the battles?
Next up. New SMG for Japan’s general progression tree.
Even a brief check of Wikipedia tells us that:
In February - March 1930, the 1928 model was subjected to comparative tests against several other submachine guns, including imports from Europe and the United States, as well as a 1927 model submachine gun. During testing, the bolt broke in this model, and the submachine gun was prematurely rejected from further testing.
So again, this is not mass produced, not supplied to elite troops, not a test batch from Easter Island.
This is one test piece of an unsuccessful SMG, which broke during firing and turned out to be worse than even the WW1 era MP-18.
But in our case everyone gets one.
I have exactly the same thoughts about AS-44, which has exactly zero evidence of use in WWII, and RD-44, which has exactly zero evidence of use in WWII, and the Fedorov Avtomat, which was a very fragile design of WW2 era and was in no way a proto- AK-47, which we basically have in Berlin 1945, as well as the MG-45 and STG-45.
This is a very sad trend that raises major concerns of a “paper tanks vs prototypes” WT style future.
PS
Will be happy to be wrong about the non-use of any of the above by regular troops.