Both Moscow and Tunisia should only see br4 at the highest.
It’s very odd and unpleasant to be hearing of br5 heavy tanks and jets in such maps
3 Likes
I disagree.
Moscow maps deserve to be present across all BRs.
It’s funny how always the vehicles are problem. 
5 Likes
Yeah, never how the T-20 or Conor’s are an issue, strange
1 Like
Moscow is mostly fine at BR5, need a couple of tweaks. But Tunisia need a lot of map reworks to work at BR5.
There was once a time where Moscow had fedorov, AVS-36, and Mkb42 spam. It’s fine at BR5.The issues with the quarry map is a problem with the map and not the BR
2 Likes
They need to move some objectives and give more cover around the map. And that one map with river crossing need bridges plus a couple of boats so people could swim safely and build rallies on the hill. Last objective on train station should have middle part a bit more open as nobody can attack it from the left including tanks. Right now they can either drive full into enemy spawn or just right and camp on a hill.
Fortified district need to move tank/apc spawn further away as right now they are spawning being seen by enemies.
if Rzhev and Stalingrad are high br games too, scred it and let’s go to the deepest areas
eh, BR5 exacerbates the issue with the quarry map, certain vehicles, cough, namely with how they are largely frontally immune at range, something that is less of an issue lower down, with one exception that comes to mind, and even that has some theoretical weak spots to aim for.
I just used those as examples,
Not really with all the fg42, tiger 2’s, is-2’s and avt40 spam that it’s about to see now. And especially when most of the infrastructure is made out of wood and can be easily penetrated with just hmg’s.
The Moscow maps aren’t build for BR 5, especially the vehicles.
And also the tractor plant for Stalingrad, it’s not really Br 5 tank friendly