Change all bot's name from pretending real player to unified and identifiable bot name

Suggestions
1

Just change those names from what we have now to things like “bot1” “bot2” or “bot alpha” “bot beta”.

7 Likes
2

TBH I don’t see any sense there. why is that important for you? most time you can see that by their behaviour and even with the current name.

4 Likes
3

would be pretty funny seeing half of your team be outperformed by Bot Bob

10 Likes
4

They are even hiding the ranks in order to prevent people from leaving, imagine how fast you’ll leave if you get into a bot1, bot2, bot alpha and bot beta team…

Playerbase it’s growing, only not significantly.

3 Likes
5

you mean like playing the game, building rallies and taking points
wait am i a bot, no my life is a lie

6

It would be good perhaps to see player names so we can report swines that teamkill, build Czech hedgehogs around friendly tanks etc. (a swine did this recently, they need to be permanently banned but I didnt know who it was).

7

don’t think we need permabans save for cheaters
but yeah griefers are a pain but then again so are idiots
like people who build rallies in such a way as to bottle up all the bots
i know they think they are helping but you turn around to find you are all alone

1 Like
8

new meta, rename ourselves to bot xyz…

1 Like
9

This will let me know which idiots will be slaughtered when the Terminator goes to war

10

Well… why would people leave when they know how many bots are in the lobby, both teams have the same amount of bots, right?
… right?

Oh no, now I know why fake bot names exist…

11

Because I wanta to play against 10 bots and dont want to team with 9 bots when the other side is full of real player. If I know I am playing against 5 real playera with only 2 real player including me I will just quit the game instead of suffering

12

but you don’t have any influence about which nations players will use at time X and you won’t have any while few mates going afk and get automatically kicked after a time or because of game crashes and so on

having less players in a team doesn’t mean that the enemies will win. :wink: we were 4 players (full squad) against 10 real players and we won without bigger issues. I love bloddy fights and I either loose a hard fight instead of rushing through the enemies in less then 10min.

13

Sad thing I can’t get enough friends to play this game. I have a lot of them come try this game but all of them got pissed off by the hard economy of the game and the high pressure of the fight

1 Like
14

go on the the official discord and take a look under “team-recruitment” and join a group

15

Same.

Clearly there’s something wrong with Enlisted as Ive had the same experience. Friends look at it and go nahhhh.

Now the following is not necessarily a complaint from me but I believe is a point worth discussing:

Would the fact that players are prevented from using the actual WWII weapons be one of the things turning people off?

Eg. If you want to play as a standard U.S GI from WWII, in any other game you have an M1 Garand and some form of Thompson SMG.
In Enlisted for most of the game you’re stuck with stupid Springfields that are no where near as good as their contemporaries on the Axis side. Likewise its not until BR III that you get some actually decent SMGs.

For me it was especially annoying having to use Springfield as a British soldier and having to grind for ages before I could even get a basic old .303 rifle. (note this was pre-merge in Tunisia).