BR 3 is a mess and we know that (high BR in general is a mess). Brought my KV1 for BR 3 only to get pitched against a King Tiger and a Panther tank in stalingrad. This is not BFV where a PZ38t gets to kill a churchill with a couple of hits, so its wise to restrict some BR loadouts (Especially Tier 5) from getting into a BR 3 match
3 Likes
I had a tiger 2 dominate Normandy from the start of the match to the finish at least in other maps the 88MM is limited by terrain and obstacle, given the vertical nature of Normandy a Tiger 2 in the grey zone can rain down death over the entire map on infantry and tanks while the puny 75MM is helpless
As mentionned before, there is a possibility to add more queues, but first devs need to collect statistics.
2 Likes
Dam bro did you changed your loadout after a BR 5 match ? thats such a pro gamer move of you. either way you’re 1 out of 100k players that have no problem with this. so you don’t mean jack all
I play BR III specifically for the gamble. I have my battlegroup set up the way I like, let’s see where we go and if we can manage despite the enemy team.
Stop being so allergic to losing. It happens occasionally.
1 Like
I have no issue losing a battle, i don’t have problems dealing with stgs, fedorovs etc. In fact i still use BA rifles with my tier 4 germany. My problem is that my tier 3 gets pitched in with a tank that i can’t destroy from the front nor getting to its side
Its not a problem everyone should ignore
1 Like
Lol. You think I’d go through the trouble of going through a BR5 match with my normal loadout, spend over 100k silver to properly fit out a BR3 loadout, and then just use that to conjure up a point?
No, no it’s legit. I stacked over 100 bodies using Garand’s and mid Thompson’s
I’m just bringing photographic proof that BR’s mean jack all in this game. 9mm from a pistol and .50 BMG out of an M2 both kill fleshbags all the same
See thats the problem you killed “players” not vehicles. I doubt your M4A1 Sherman can kill a tiger 2. “Oh just get through its side im sure you’ll be able to pen it” they’re greyzone camping good luck getting there in time.
But hey if you think tiger 2s against M3 lee sounds fun, by all means have “fun”.
2 Likes
You see, I am not limited by your simple parameters
I love killing enemy tanks, by any means
Cannons, explosion packs, AT Guns, AT weapons, bombs, rockets. I just love sending those gray zone filth to the fiery depths
So of course, the M9 (best AT weapon in the game so far hands down) is BR3. Just that alone kills just about every tank in the game easy
If I find my AT Men aren’t sufficient? Well, I find there isn’t a single armored unit in the game that can resist ordinance raining from the sky
Most of your planes have 100-500lb’ers. Heck the Dauntless at BR2 I think it is has a whole dang 1000lb’er. Any of these are more than enough to kill any tank. Bigger the bomb the easier it is of course
If you’re so darn upset or worried about what tank your enemy may or may not bring? Bring a plane. Be the solution. Especially if you don’t have faith that one of your teammates will be. Stop whining about how unfair the Tiger II is, grab the stick and throttle, and shove a bomb down its throat. Problem solved
2 Likes
Tiger 2 shouldn’t be in BR 3 to begin with. stop pretending like its a normal thing in the game
1 Like
No shit because US BR3 is op when it comes to infantry weapons. BAR is the best lmg in a game, M1 Garand is as good as BR4 Axis semis, and Thompsons are way better than any BR4 Axis smg and especially garbage BR3. So you are practically play as BR4/5 loadout when it comes to the firepower.
1 Like
I’d say it depends on what BRs they assign future campaigns such as Kursk. 1943 was roughly the last hurrah of the KV. They can certainly add the early Tiger model for earlier battles
My only issue with the update was painfully obvious historical hiccups. One thing is for sure I do not like seeing Panthers, FG 42s, Gewehr 43s, Panzer 4 Js, Panzerfausts in Stalingrad. Not to mention AS 44s
1 Like
Nevermind, BR2 is no longer playable. Since all tryhard (except German ones) move there.
Seems I am quitting the game for time. Going to play BG3 in meantime, bye.
1 Like
Oh so BR3 is super inferior and absolutely cannot possibly fight BR5…unless it’s American. Then it’s entirely ok
Oh, oh, but Germans are entirely way too OP
Make up your minds people
BR5 Axis are op no doubt about it, however if you go down to BR1-3 then Axis get underpowered (except some tanks), Allies BR1-3 are OP but BR3 may match against BR4/5 and get demolished. Soviets are op at any BR range.
1 Like
IMO the BR itself isn’t the issue. it’s all about the map layout (fuck those actually good tanker on normandy beach hill), and the quality of players in both team (FUCKING BUILD RALLY POINTS YOU LESS THAN BOT USEFULLNESS PLAYERS).
that said, they really should tightened the BR spread, i think they still do 1-2-3 and 3-4-5 which sounds kinda stupid. why not just do 1-2, 3-4, and 4-5? surely that should make the gear more equal?
1 Like
So let me get this straight
If using American BR5, German BR5 is OP
If using American BR3, German BR5 is NOT OP
Soviet is OP (makes sense, Gaijin is the game’s publisher, does this surprise ANYONE?)
Am I correct?
1 Like
Consider the number of weapons combinations in detailed queue base existed +n/-n
If you roll into BR1-3 then you will be more powerful than the Axis (with infantry weapons, tanks are a bit worse due lack of APHE), but if you roll into BR5 then Axis is more powerful and most poeple will desert that game.
1 Like