i can tell this new flak is nothing compretable to one old with 4 barrel can u please give us back it
2 Likes
I personally Prefer the New ones, there more accurate, more immersive, and plenty lethal, I just shot down 3 planes in one match with the Polstine.
5 Likes
well i know but 4 barrel one is like this if these of one bullet miss 3 will get job if also 2 barrel miss other 2 will get job but for one barrel is not case
1 Like
Maybe they could add more powerful AA guns like the M45 quad, Bofors, etc; just like we have MG nests and heavy MGs
no i like older one
So in short, you want the AA that is more forgiving because you can’t learn to aim with only 1
5 Likes
Problem with the quad was not every country had an equivalent to it. The US’s closest approximation is the M45 which would be beyond broken even with depression limiter, and Russia and Japan kind of both just get left out to dry. Sine the quad doesn’t work balance wize, so they gave ust the single mounts. The singe mounts aren’t bad either, one good shot to the critical components and the plane still goes down. You only get punished if you are shotgunning the AA gun at the lead indicator.
All the powers during the war used a wide variety of weaponry, and this game is somewhat asymmetrically balanced, so I’m sure they could find a suitable heavy AA gun to add to the game
1 Like
is hard man
Japan tends to mount their 20mms (the Type 98 and the Type 2) only up to twin mounts, and they have a 25mm mounted also up to a twin mount. Every larger gun after that is a three inch flak gun or larger, which would not be useful in this game whatsoever, as already demonstrated by the Russian 25mm. The Russians have it even worse, as they mounted basically all of their AA guns in single mounts, with the only major exception being the multiple gun Maxim mounts they sometimes made. They then have 37mm and 45mm which fire even slower than the 25mm gun they have in game right now, and then flak guns. You can maybe get away with the asymmetric balance argument with the M45, but that one would likely become an even greater point of contention due to how much better it is at almost everything. So again, half the factions in game don’t have any good equivalent to the quad mount 20mm, and the one that does have something of the sort would destroy the game’s balance if you added it. This isn’t even a case where asymmetric balance can be attempted because there isn’t anything that exists that can be declared a rough equivalent to the quad mount flak. So unless you want to go back to giving everyone Flak 38s, the only way to have both faction specific AA guns and be somewhat balanced is to reduce the number of guns on the AA.
1 Like
I liked that idea some one mention once, with new AA, was to have them upgradeable, with engineer class 1,2,3 etc, upgrades could be like a gun/rifle etc, accuracy, shot power, new barrels etc.
2 Likes
i like one aa oldest one with 4 barrel what is will supossed to do with just one barrel
Wait till they making there diving run, or after they flown past, before shooting, as to not give away your position, then, depending on distance, aim in front of the targeting circle, that will be preceding the plane,
will try and take a screen shot next game, and show what i mean,
so plane coming at you, there’s the target circle, and try and time it, that when you fire, by time your round hits that circle in middle, you want them flying into that, with no way , to get of the way.
Hoping some one may be able to describe it better
4 barrels, one barrel, same thing, double tap ? 
they wont bring it back anyway, so just be patient, with one barrel.
Im waiting for more news, but i think new anti air vehicles from Warthunder is coming (SPAA), or infantry trucks etc. We will see