Campaigns rework

The current campaign system is a dead end, I think everyone understands this, so I propose my idea of reworking campaigns.

I’ll take Moscow as an example.This campaign should be renamed the "Eastern Front 1941-1943” and divided into three periods (which are gradually progression, 1 < 2 < 3)

The first period will be the various battles of 1941:Murmansk, Leningrad, Moscow, Brest, Kiev, etc. It will be from 1 to n level with pre-war and modern (for that year) weapons.Only players with weapons of the first period will be able to get to these maps only.

The second period will be the various battles of 1942:Voronezh, Stalingrad, etc.
All players will have access to these maps, except those who have 3 periods of weapons.
This period will "last” from the end of pumping the first to the beginning of the third.The weapons will already be suitable for 1942,for example mkb,tiger. (perhaps the period will not be particularly large)

The third period will be the various battles of 1943:Stalingrad (you can make other maps of Stalingrad than in the second period, or change them), Kursk, Leningrad, etc.
The period will start from the end of the second.All players will have access to the maps of this period, but players with weapons of the third period will not be able to get to the maps of first and second periods,only third period maps.

With the rest of the campaign, I suggest doing this.

I propose renaming Normandy to the “Western Front 1943-1945” and starting with the Italian campaign, and ending with the capture of West Germany.

Tunisia should be renamed the “African Campaign”.
It will begin with the fighting in 1941 (Tobruk, El Alamein, etc.), will end with the Tunisia.

Rename Berlin to the “Eastern Front 1944-1945” and start with Operation Bagration, and finish with Berlin (Between this you can make Koningsberg\Hungary\Czechoslovakia, etc.)

So that’s why I suggest doing so:
1.We will be able to see various maps and battles of the Second World War

2.This will minimally divide online, since players with weapons of the first period will fall into both the second and third (forgive me, new players, but you are already suffering).

3.You don’t have to unlock the same weapon ten thousand times.

4.Due to the fact that players with weapons of the third period fall only on the maps of the second, and players with weapons of the second period do not fall on the maps of the first period (they fall on the maps of the second and third), we will retain some historicity and there will be no tiger near Moscow.

This system is not perfect, but I think it’s the best option to add all the companies so that you don’t have to get weapons again for the hundredth time, and so that online is more or less in good.I also understand that my idea is very expensive, but it’s just an idea.What do you think?

9 Likes

Im just wondering what effect that would have on player count and que times. I guess it wouldnt be super bad but like you said new players would greatly suffer

I think new players don’t care.
PZ 2 against t-50 suffers the same way it will suffer from t34\KV.
The T-60 against the PZ4 suffers the same way it will suffer from the tiger\ panther.
So I think it’s okay.

1 Like

Interesting,why it was hidden?
@DieJagdente

Lol, err some peeps flagged it and if too many does it its autohidden

4 Likes

Interesting what’s so bad about this topic?

3 Likes

topic not bad
but no one takes you seriously [145 views and 4 likes [1 from same kind russian +1 from forum moderator] and 1 respond]

1 Like

Because topics where germany suffer more interesting.

1 Like

oh yes [no]
you have alternative point of view on reality
no one can help there

You just rare read English forum.

you know i more write then read

but i create there tread about sina nipon war - all ok we not insult each other psts only about tread no that trash as we have on our branch of forum

There are more skeptics on the Russian side.And there are more diverse people.
Here you can be taken as an example.

Inspired by your divided period idea and WT BR system, give all squad some sort of BR, which represent the what timeline it should be. The Matchmaker will automatically select the highest timeline and match with that timeline.

There are some potential issues that I thought of when uniting such campaigns especially on the Eastern Front, since the campaign is going to be fought on both summer and winter, there will be a need for two different sets of uniforms with summer and winter uniforms being different to each other.

Also its going to be a handful what if im in the mood for Stalingrad but I have third period stuff which is going to be tough switching out equipment and stuff which can be easily fixed with customizable presets.

I would love late war Eastern Front and this is really interesting idea with more variety than ever.

Quite, but I think they will definitely never do it.

Well, as you said - presets, no problems, but more potential money for customization.
But I think my concept of rework of campaigns after the appearance of Stalingrad is irrelevant.

Based, you have my approval of this idea instead of the merge.

-From the future

1 Like

Yeah, thank you, I’ve now seen so many curves in this topic and I don’t understand why I haven’t fixed it.
Like “companies”.

1 Like